[XML-SIG] yet another output encoding
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:17:05 +0100
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I thought about such a possibility today too: maybe all
> we need is a simple registry of error handlers. The handlers
> are then addressed using their string name and we can leave
> the existing APIs (which use const char *error parameters)
> in place.
> Is that what you have in mind too ?
The encoder would still have to (re)allocate the unicode
object passed in as Py_UNICODE*/int but only once and only
for unknown error handling names.
>>Now the only remaining problem is time! :-/
> Python 2.3 will leave us around 6 months -- should be
> enough :-)