[XML-SIG] yet another output encoding

Walter Dörwald walter@livinglogic.de
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:17:05 +0100

M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

 > [...]

> I thought about such a possibility today too: maybe all
> we need is a simple registry of error handlers. The handlers
> are then addressed using their string name and we can leave
> the existing APIs (which use const char *error parameters)
> in place.
> Is that what you have in mind too ?


The encoder would still have to (re)allocate the unicode
object passed in as Py_UNICODE*/int but only once and only
for unknown error handling names.

>>Now the only remaining problem is time! :-/
> Python 2.3 will leave us around 6 months -- should be 
> enough :-)

I hope.

    Walter Dörwald