[XML-SIG] XBEL / Call for extension
junkc at fh-trier.de
Fri Jan 28 17:42:03 CET 2005
Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 17:26 schrieb Uche Ogbuji:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:57 +0100, Christian Junk wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 16:46 schrieb Uche Ogbuji:
> > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:44 +0100, Christian Junk wrote:
> > > > Perhaps we should think of using XML Scheme instead of DTD?
> > >
> > > RELAX NG, please.
> > So, don't you like XML Scheme?
> No. I don't like W3C XML Schema. I think it's far too quirky and
> But no need for schema language wars. We can start with one language
> and use tools such as trang to generate others. I do think that RELAX
> NG has the most expressive power (except for Schematron), so I still
> think it's the best starting place.
You're right! If it is required we can still translate a RNC syntax definition
to a XML scheme, automatically ;) But whatever scheme language we use, you
all agree that DTD is no alternative for the future of XBEL?
Christian Junk <junkc at fh-trier.de>
FH Trier, University of Applied Sciences
Faculty of Design and Applied Computer Science
More information about the XML-SIG