hellos, Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags? Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on their software? Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a database. cheers, 2009/4/17 Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek@gmail.com>
2009/4/16 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin@v.loewis.de>:
I don't see it in the list (just LGPL without any version detail), I am ccing this request to catalog-sig so they can add it if they think it's wise
How should this be done? As a separate classifier with the suffix v3, or as a subclassifier of LGPL?
Looking at others (Mozilla Public License) I would go for a separate one with the suffix.
But what about LGPL 2 and 2.1 (It seems that 2.1 is introduces a lot of changes) ?
Maybe "LGPL2+" would be better for the 2.x series (and maybe 2+ includes v3 ?)
Maybe we could ask someone at the FSF so we have the best versions in our Trove classifier.
Regards Tarek
Regards, Martin
-- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig