Le 29/09/2018 à 12:44, Łukasz Langa a écrit :
On Sep 29, 2018, at 11:24, Paul Moore <p.f.moore@gmail.com <mailto:p.f.moore@gmail.com>> wrote:
Are committers *not* active in the past two releases not considered? Your figures seem biased. (Was I part of that 30? I committed some changes in the last 2 releases. Barely anything, and I do *not* consider myself very active in terms of code changes, but how many tiers are we working with here? People who were at the sprints, people "active in the past 2 releases", "the rest"?
There is discussion *just* about this here: https://discuss.python.org/t/which-list-of-core-developers-is-authoritative/... <https://discuss.python.org/t/which-list-of-core-developers-is-authoritative/55?u=ambv>
It would be nice not to mingle different concerns, though. We may want to have a discussion over what an "active" core developer is (and perhaps reach an official decision if desired), but in the meantime we should avoid using the "active / inactive" distinction when discussing who can voice their opinion on topics such as communication tools.
Regards
Antoine.