On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:32 PM Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> wrote:

Hi Zaied,

On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 19:27:49 +0000, Zaied Zaman wrote:

...

Do any one is currently working in BM3D? If anyone is, do you have any perfectly working implementation of BM3D, preferably, in Matlab, can you kindly share if you have?

I am not aware of any such efforts, although it would certainly be of interest. It is on our list of requested features:

https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/wiki/Requested-features

Best regards, Stéfan ___________________________________

Hi Zaied, The original authors of the BM3D paper have a Matlab implementation at http://www.cs.tut.fi/~foi/GCF-BM3D/ However, if I remember correctly it relies on some pre-compiled MEX files so isn't really open source. It is free to use for non-profit/academic purposes, though. There was also a C++ implementation published in IPOL http://www.ipol.im/pub/art/2012/l-bm3d/

Thanks a lot. Z ________________________________ From: Stefan van der Walt <stefanv@berkeley.edu> Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 1:32 AM To: Mailing list for scikit-image (http://scikit-image.org) Subject: [scikit-image] Re: Regarding new working implementation of BM3D preferrably in Matlab Hi Zaied, On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 19:27:49 +0000, Zaied Zaman wrote:

Do any one is currently working in BM3D? If anyone is, do you have any perfectly working implementation of BM3D, preferably, in Matlab, can you kindly share if you have?

I am not aware of any such efforts, although it would certainly be of interest. It is on our list of requested features: https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/wiki/Requested-features Best regards, Stéfan _______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list -- scikit-image@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to scikit-image-leave@python.org