[Catalog-sig] [Proposal] Registered packages must provide the source code distribution on PyPI
Andreas Jung
lists at zopyx.com
Thu Jun 17 11:05:19 CEST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
> I guess it's better to tell the package authors about your
> use of their packages and offer them help in hosting their
> packages on more reliable infrastructures.
>
> If that doesn't solve your problem, it's likely better
> to either setup your own index to override the PyPI one
> (should be easy to do in zc.buildout and AFAIK at least
> Plone is already doing that), or you stop using
> the package and look for alternatives.
Sorry - I disagree completely. As developer I am into developing
software and not into building private infrastructure to get around the
deficiencies of PyPI and the ignorance of some package maintainers
caring about the needs of the developers using their packages.
Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwZ5U8ACgkQCJIWIbr9KYxrVACdH6G8zDI/6RMjAywRSvUhri8M
F08Anins1oOc3abEMSc4FZggol0cQjXl
=5fgV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lists.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/attachments/20100617/79ab9022/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Catalog-SIG
mailing list