[Distutils] Time for a setuptools_lite??
waynejwerner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 21 13:44:38 EDT 2015
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:32 PM, David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt <
> opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:
>> why does that have to be in setuptools ?!
>> if we want a new light system to begin with, shouldn't it be far more
>> sustainable to use just implementations of the new standards rather than
>> leaving all of setuptools
>> there is no viable way in setuptools to get rid of the legacy ina sane
>> and fast manner, it would drag out over years
> agreed. I have never met a person who had to deal substantially with
> distutils code and enjoyed the experience.
> The whole architecture is fundamentally flawed. I wrote this a long time
> ago, but I still stand by most arguments:
I've (luckily?) never had to deal with distutils code... I am definitely
digging the post. First time I've read it, but I am definitely more
pro-standard-interface-and-let-tools-do-with-it-what-they-will than I was a
few minutes ago.
Would pip's freeze format work a la the cabal file, or is it missing too
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Distutils-SIG