[Mailman-Users] Changed port, but not all scripts use the new address

[Ben Armstrong]

Ahhh ... well, it was just to test the list.  We quickly moved from
testing to implementing, and I'm happy to say, we are thrilled with
the results (see http://www.nslug.ns.ca/mailman/listinfo) for our
LUG.  Thanks for an excellent package!  It is so easy to administer,
looks great, and only lacks a decent search engine.

Ben

On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:

> 
> >>>>> "BA" == Ben Armstrong <synrg at sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> writes:
> 
>     BA> Now I am finding some of the URLs are correct, while others
>     BA> are not.  In particular, all of the buttons on the listinfo
>     BA> page (subscribe, visit subscriber list, edit options) point at
>     BA> the old address
>     BA> (e.g. http://sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca/mailman/subscribe/nslug-test)
> 
>     BA> What have I missed?
> 
> Only that Mailman hasn't been well tested with a port number in the
> URL.  I fixed a few cases that were broken, but I'm sure I didn't
> catch them all.
> 
> -Barry
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users maillist  -  Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
> 
> 

--
    nSLUG       http://www.nslug.ns.ca      synrg at sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca
    Debian      http://www.debian.org       synrg at debian.org
    Chebucto    http://www.chebucto.ns.ca   aa458 at chebucto.ns.ca
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0  1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]