FW: [Mailman-Users] 1.0 running!, one other problem

Joshua S. Freeman jfreeman at scansoft.com
Tue Sep 14 19:05:48 CEST 1999


I have one address in there which is an alias that someone in house was
using... because of the nature of that alias, they were unable to actually
'subscribe' that alias....

other than that, there's nothing in there, and the part that says

Must posts be approved by an administrator? is 'no' too...


>From: Nigel Metheringham <Nigel.Metheringham at VData.co.uk>
>To: "Joshua S. Freeman" <jfreeman at scansoft.com>
>Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] 1.0 running!, one other problem
>Date: Tue, Sep 14, 1999, 10:49

> jfreeman at scansoft.com said:
>> The only strange thing that's happened as a result is that EVERY post
>> to EVERY list is being held for approval even though the option in the
>> General Posting Filters for every list says NOT to hold for
>> approval... even do not restrict to subscribers...
> Have you got something in the "Addresses of members accepted for
> posting to this list without implicit approval requirement. " box in
> privacy options - I found this didn't do what I expected it too....
>  Nigel.
> --
> [ Nigel Metheringham                  Nigel.Metheringham at VData.co.uk ]
> [ Phone: +44 1423 850000                         Fax +44 1423 858866 ]

More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list