[Mailman-Users] Mail headers with Mailman

[J C Lawrence]

On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:06:40 -0800 
Ed Lazor <osmosis at atfantasy.com> wrote:

>> We have different definitions of "unreasonable".  I consider that
>> not requiring your members to such is not only unreasonable, but
>> foolhardy.  <shrug> YMMV.

> Having different definitions is fine.  I respect your opinion.
> I'm also glad I don't follow all of the proposed standards on the
> net and force people to adhere to them.  That would translate to a
> large amount of changes, many for proposals that would never
> become standard.

The bit you are missing is that RFC 2369
(http://www.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/mfs/01/23xx/2369) is on the standards
track, is widely adopted and fairly well supported by other tools
outside of Mailman.  This is no new flash in the pan -- its over two
years old now.

-- 
J C Lawrence                                       claw at kanga.nu
---------(*)                          http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--