[Mailman-Users] Reply-to in umbrella lists

[Martin]

Brad Knowles wrote:


>>At 11:30 AM +0200 2004-06-07, Martin wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>  
>
>>>> is it possible to change "dynamicly" the "Reply-to"-Field to the mail address
>>>> of the umbrella list when the mail is sent to the umbrella list and not
>>>> directly to the sublist ?
>>>>    
>>>>
>>    
>>
>>
>>	I believe that this question has been asked on the mailing list 
>>before, but I don't recall if there was a solution, or what the 
>>solution was.  I'd encourage you to search the archives.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>  
>
I have asked this question already but got no answer


>>	Thinking about this, one thing you might be able to do would be 
>>set a forced reply-to header for the umbrella list, and then do not 
>>set any reply-to header in any of the sublists.
>>
>>  
>>
>  
>
I this case I have no reply-header when I send directly to the
sublist


>>	Alternatively, you could have each of the sub-lists set their 
>>reply-to header to point back to the umbrella list.
>>  
>>
>  
>
When I send directly to a sublist normally the replies should only
go to the sublist and not to any umbrella list


>>	In theory, one of the other of those should have the desired effect.
>>
>>  
>>
>  
>

Now I solved the problem with procmail using the FAQ:

http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#4.15


and the following procmailrc entry:

RECIPIENT=`formail -zxTo:`

:0fwh
| formail -I "Reply-To: $RECIPIENT"

:0
|/usr/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post ${MAILMAN}



Martin