[Mailman-Users] Email command upgrade
John W. Baxter
jwblist at olympus.net
Tue Oct 5 02:17:00 CEST 2004
On 10/4/2004 14:04, "Brad Knowles" <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org> wrote:
> At 10:24 AM -0700 2004-10-04, John W. Baxter wrote:
>> Now look at Qualcom's MUA products and their implementation of the RFC.
>> This appears to be low priority, in that Eudora 5 and 6 have emerged since
>> the RFC.
> Qualcomm does just fine in this respect. Qualcomm is not the
Not that I had noticed. Although I don't read many mailing lists in Mac
Eudora any more. (Also, I wasn't the original accuser of Qualcomm.)
OK, so what does Eudora do to make the RFC 2919 headers useful? All I think
it does out of the box is not filter any of them in its presentation of a
message, leading to endless complaints about "those headers" and being the
prime trigger for Mailman's current ability to turn them off. (Then there
was fine-tuning about the List-Post vs announce-only lists, not caused by
Adding them to the Boring Headers list is easier in Mac Eudora than in
Windows Eudora, and I added most of them to the list in Mac Eudora, so that
I had a chance of reading the actual message without scrolling. (I did edit
the appropriate .ini file for Windows Eudora once...that edit was lost in
the death of a hard drive (my Windows machine isn't important enough to
justify the level of backups which would have gotten it back)).
More information about the Mailman-Users