[Mailman-Users] illeagal email address
John W. Baxter
jwblist at olympus.net
Thu Sep 16 17:29:05 CEST 2004
On 9/16/2004 8:15, "Ian Eiloart" <iane at sussex.ac.uk> wrote:
> --On Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:04 am -0700 "John W. Baxter"
> <jwblist at olympus.net> wrote:
>> On 9/12/2004 20:15, "Al Mellis" <amellis at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> we are having a problem with the following type of email address
>>> weincek_g/li at dns.u46.k12.il.us
>>> it seems that the forward slash is having mailman listserv reject this
>>> email address and any others loke it. Is there a way around it?
>> Well, the address is legal per the RFCs. Some MTAs protect themselves
>> against the damage such addressing can do (eg, when computing a local
>> part's mail directory path, and the address is crafted to do harm) by
>> disallowing it in their default configurations.
> Yep, if you are on pretty much any linux/unix/macosx system, then using a
> slash in a list name is asking for trouble. My *guess* is that the Mailman
> code would prohibit it. After all, Mailman uses the list name as a file or
> directory name in several places.
But that / isn't in the list name, it is in the local part of a (would-be)
subscribed address. At least as I read the question.
I would indeed expect Mailman to prohibit a / in a list name.
More information about the Mailman-Users