[Mailman-Users] message body is blank for some users
Heal Secretary
secretary at healheadingley.org.uk
Tue Aug 1 21:35:54 CEST 2006
Dear Brad, Mark, Dragon and others
Further to this problem.... (some user's mailings to the list are
sent to the list with a blank body), I have taken your advice.......
At 21:58 31/5/06, you wrote:
>Check your settings. Have the user send you a message directly,
>then use whatever techniques your MUA allows you to have to see all
>the messy headers and MIME body structure. If you don't have an MUA
>that lets you see all that, you'll need to get an MUA that will.
The direct message from my user, Jonathan, is copied below. Can
anyone see why Jonathan's mailings would be sent to the list with a blank body?
Many thanks for any advice, and please word your reply for a biffo
Nigel
*************************************************************
From ???@??? Sun May 07 11:28:46 2006
Return-path: <Jonathan's email address>
Envelope-to: secretary at healheadingley.org.uk
Delivery-date: Sat, 06 May 2006 21:35:55 +0100
Received: from hopeful9 by colo16.ukhost4u.com with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1FcTVJ-0006H7-Tt
for secretary at healheadingley.org.uk; Sat, 06 May 2006 21:35:55 +0100
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on colo16.ukhost4u.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from [65.54.168.37] (helo=hotmail.com)
by colo16.ukhost4u.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1FcTVJ-0006H1-Gk
for secretary at healheadingley.org.uk; Sat, 06 May 2006 21:35:53 +0100
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Sat, 6 May 2006 13:36:01 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY113-F2775CB9724C4ED7D753A17D2AA0 at phx.gbl>
Received: from 65.54.168.200 by by113fd.bay113.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Sat, 06 May 2006 20:35:58 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [62.252.224.13]
X-Originating-Email: [Jonathan's email address]
X-Sender: Jonathan's email address
From: "Jonathan" <Jonathan's email address>
To: secretary at healheadingley.org.uk
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Blank replies
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 20:35:58 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2006 20:36:01.0070 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AFFD3CE0:01C6714C]
<x-html>
<html><div style='background-color:'><P><BR><BR></P>
<DIV class=RTE>
<P>Hi Nigel, </P>
<P>Re Sent my reply email a few mins ago and it's blank again!!
Shame, as its a good one!</P>
<P>The Bcc I sent to myself was fine, so it seems to be something
wrong at your end.</P>
<P>Below is a copy of the the email text I am trying to send!!</P>
<P>Regards</P>
<P>Jonathan</P>
<P>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</P>
<DIV>
<P>Value of Cost?<BR><BR>Could this (proposed?!) car park development
in an inner city urban green space, seemingly either to help car
travelers to park in someone else's back-yard and/or to raise income
for a Department of the Council, and certainly in contradiction of
any Sustainable Development Policy that the Council is apparently
signed up to, be summed up as the councilors concerned knowing the
cost of everything and the value of nothing, or maybe I have
missed something here?</P>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Alan, in response to your email; there is trust in
people, trust in community involvement, trust in councilors and
trust in local government and trust in the need to defend the
environment against all the vagaries of human decision making systems. </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>There always seems to be a hidden interest
(unintentionally, overt or not) trying to bulldozing through what
community, green space and local environments we have left! It seems
to be part of 20th Century's man and woman governance that we need to
stop!</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Perhaps we could suggest that the Leeds Millennium
Square be turned into a tarmac car park and deny its view and space
to public use?. That would look lovely! And they want to do this to
our open park spaces in the inner city! Back off! </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Regards </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV class=RTE>Jonathan</DIV>
<DIV class=RTE> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #a0c6e5 2px
solid"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>
<DIV></DIV>From: <I>Rich T
<followfoucault at gmail.com></I><BR>Reply-To: <I>for
local activists
<activists at healheadingley.org.uk></I><BR>To: <I>a.slomson at leeds.ac.uk,for
local activists <activists at healheadingley.org.uk>,William
McKinnon
<mackius at mac.com></I><BR>CC: <I>justchill at tiscali.co.uk,
isobelsidebottom at hotmail.com,barrie.payne1 at virgin.net,
activists at healheadingley.org.uk,Christine Bethlehem
<chris.bethlehem at ntlworld.com></I><BR>Subject: <I>Re:
[activists] Woodhouse Moor Car Park Proposal - Oliver Cross
article</I><BR>Date: <I>Fri, 05 May 2006 11:18:26
+0100</I><BR>>Alan, you're absolutely right - and this point has
been raised<BR>>frequently at Headingley
Forum. Unfortunately, despite the coverage<BR>>of our
area by bottom-up groups, the Council remains committed
to<BR>>top-down - and often, not even that. Richard
T<BR>><BR>>At 08:12 05/05/2006, Alan Slomson wrote:<BR>>
>This story, the story of the Headingley Run last Sunday, and the
problems with<BR>> >Headingley Stadium have a common feature:
inadequate consultation of local<BR>> >people by the Council.
This seems to me to be a systematic failure which needs<BR>>
>to be addressed over and above concerns about particular
cases.<BR>> ><BR>> >Councillors are busy people, often
doing full time jobs on top of<BR>> >Council work,<BR>>
>so the problem needs to be dealt with at the level of Council
officers.<BR>> ><BR>> >Given that in the area there are a
number of well established community groups<BR>> >with fairly
well defined spheres of interest, and that electronic<BR>>
>communication<BR>> >is now so
easy, it should not be difficult to develop a system where
community<BR>> >groups get frequent advance notice of matters
that might be of<BR>> >concern to them.<BR>> >Once such a
system has been established, it should not take too much effort
to<BR>> >operate. But, perhaps more importantly, both Council
officials and Councillors<BR>> >need to be firmly committed to
this sort of early consultation, and<BR>> >that has to<BR>>
>be a real will to implement it.<BR>> >--<BR>> >Alan
Slomson<BR>> >20 Grosvenor Park Gardens<BR>>
>Leeds<BR>> >LS6 2PL<BR>> >e-mail:
a.slomson at leeds.ac.uk<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> >Quoting
William McKinnon <mackius at mac.com> on Fri 05 May 2006 07:06:29
BST:<BR>> ><BR>> > > Dear Friends of Woodhouse
Moor<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Oliver Cross had a
very interesting article in last Friday's YEP about the<BR>> >
> proposed car park. In case you didn't see it, I've
attached it to this<BR>> > > email.<BR>> >
><BR>> > > Regards.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >
Bill McKinnon<BR>> > > 225 2700<BR>> > ><BR>>
> ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > >
PS. Mr Cross was one of those who attended last Thursday's
drop-in.<BR>> > ><BR>> >
><BR>><BR>><BR>>_______________________________________________<BR>>--<BR>>activists
mailing
list<BR>>activists at healheadingley.org.uk<BR>>http://mail.healheadingley.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/activists_healheadingley.org.uk<BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<P> </P>
<P><BR><BR> </P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT:
#a0c6e5 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 11px;
FONT-FAMILY: tahoma,sans-serif">
<HR color=#a0c6e5 SIZE=1>
<DIV></DIV>From: <I>Heal Secretary
<secretary at healheadingley.org.uk></I><BR>To: <I>"Jonathan"
<Jonathan's email address></I><BR>Subject: <I>Re:
Blank replies</I><BR>Date: <I>Sat, 06 May 2006 20:32:35
+0100</I><BR>>Hi Jonathan<BR>>Thanks for letting me know about
this.<BR>>I've just got back from holiday (Why does something odd
always have <BR>>to happen when I'm away!)<BR>>I've no idea
what this is, but I'll look into it. It may take me a <BR>>bit of
tinkering to diagnose the problem.<BR>>I see what you mean about
the blank email - I got it too.<BR>>Can you please re-send your
message, to the Activists? Please let me <BR>>know if it works
this time.<BR>>Many thanks<BR>>Nigel<BR>><BR>><BR>>At
14:26 5/5/06, you
wrote:<BR>><BR>>>Hi,<BR>>><BR>>>am I being gaged or is
something wrong technically?. When I sent a <BR>>>reply to the
acitivist list today ( Re: [activists] Woodhouse Moor <BR>>>Car
Park Proposal) the email reply was blank. Is it something
with <BR>>>Richard T's email??<BR>>><BR>>>On the
blank email was a subscribtion link, which I have tried and
<BR>>>I since gor an email saying that an attempt was made to
subscribe ( <BR>>>it was me!!)<BR>>><BR>>>Please
help as I want to
contribute.<BR>>><BR>>>Thanks<BR>>><BR>>>Jonathan<BR>>>07906
973 370<BR>><BR>>Secretary of Heal<BR>>Campaigning for a
Sustainable Balanced
Community<BR>>www.healheadingley.org.uk<BR>><BR>>If you want
to post items of interest to Headingley residents, use <BR>>the
Message Board on the web site<BR>><BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></div></html>
</x-html>
********************************************************************
Secretary of Heal Headingley
Campaigning for a Sustainable Balanced Community
www.healheadingley.org.uk
More information about the Mailman-Users
mailing list