[Mailman-Users] PGP keys causing problems

Todd Zullinger tmz at pobox.com
Wed May 17 22:06:18 CEST 2006

Hash: SHA1

Jeff DeReus wrote:
> Unfortunately filter_content was not set to yes.  I am assuming that
> would be fairly "handy".

I'm not sure whether that will any effect on the archiving or not.
It's been a long time since I tested that.

> Although everything goes through properly with filter_content
> disabled and when unsigned.

To be clear, does the message arrive properly to list members or is
the attachment and body stripped there as well as in the archives?  In
my testing only the archived copy was stripped.

> As to the message in the archives, the only piece that successfully
> arrived was
> Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part
> -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...  Name: PGP.sig
> Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a
> digitally signed message part Url :
> http://www.blah.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20060510/529c55f0/PGP.bin
> <http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20060510/529c55f0/PGP.bin>

The archiver bug is mentioned here, but I couldn't see any resolution
to that part of the problem (and sourceforge isn't cooperating with me


> However, viewing the list mbox file the full message with the
> attachment ?flattened? is there.

Flattened?  Reading the mbox of my test list with mutt the message and
attachment were all normal and the signature verified properly.

- -- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all.

Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.


More information about the Mailman-Users mailing list