[Mailman-Users] PGP keys causing problems

[Jeff DeReus]

On 5/17/06, Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> > Unfortunately filter_content was not set to yes.  I am assuming that
> > would be fairly "handy".
>
> I'm not sure whether that will any effect on the archiving or not.
> It's been a long time since I tested that.
>
> > Although everything goes through properly with filter_content
> > disabled and when unsigned.
>
> To be clear, does the message arrive properly to list members or is
> the attachment and body stripped there as well as in the archives?  In
> my testing only the archived copy was stripped.


The actual text and key arrived to the mailing list.  At this point I cannot
verify from anyone if the attachment made it through correctly.  my
apologies.

I have enabled the content_filter and added mime_types to see if this will
solve my little problem.

application/pgp-signature
multipart/signed

As you might understand, losing patches is not a desirable outcome, so maybe
in the meantime this will have some effect.


> As to the message in the archives, the only piece that successfully
> > arrived was
> >
> > Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part
> > -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...  Name: PGP.sig
> > Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a
> > digitally signed message part Url :
> >
> http://www.blah.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20060510/529c55f0/PGP.bin
> > <
> http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20060510/529c55f0/PGP.bin
> >
>
> The archiver bug is mentioned here, but I couldn't see any resolution
> to that part of the problem (and sourceforge isn't cooperating with me
> ATM):
>
>     http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-coders/2005-March/001687.html
>
> > However, viewing the list mbox file the full message with the
> > attachment ?flattened? is there.
>
> Flattened?  Reading the mbox of my test list with mutt the message and
> attachment were all normal and the signature verified properly.


I am probably using the wrong word in the wrong place here.  Everything is
displayed properly in the mbox for the list.  It is only the archive that is
affected.

Thank you,
Jeff D

- --
> Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
> ======================================================================
> A snooze button is a poor substitute for no alarm clock at all.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
>
> iG0EARECAC0FAkRrgjomGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9ib3guY29tL350bXovcGdwL3Rt
> ei5hc2MACgkQuv+09NZUB1qNiQCgyOLh8+FLr+VOhAM2smIW6VS7MyQAn2p27nQv
> /h16smlehbhCcMqyfV7/
> =JTNq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Mailman-Users mailing list
> Mailman-Users at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
> Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
> Searchable Archives:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/jdereus%40gmail.com
>
> Security Policy:
> http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&amp;file=faq01.027.htp
>