[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.10 has been released

[Mark Sapiro]

Brad Knowles wrote:

>On 4/21/08, Brad Knowles wrote:
>
>>>   I have applied the patch to my installation and I'm sure it's good, but
>>>   I haven't seen any unparseable messages.
>>
>>  I haven't seen any more unparseable messages in the last few minutes,
>>  but let's see how things go.
>
>We've now had a couple of unparseable messages since applying the 
>patch, and it seems to be working as expected.
>
>
>Going back to Jun 12 23:48:51 2007, it looks like we've had a total 
>of about 378,989 unparseable messages, although we only have just 
>over 8000 messages in the mailman/qfiles/shunt and 
>mailman/qfiles/shunt.old directories (7759 .psv files, and 312 .pck 
>files).
>
>That works out to about 37,900 unparseable messages per month, or 
>something like about 125 unparseable messages per day.


The light dawns! (thanks to the post at
<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2008-April/061365.html>).

There was an error in 2.1.9 that didn't delete (or move aside) the .bak
file in qfiles/in from an unparseable message. Thus, there were 7500+
unparseable message qfiles/in/*.bak files when you restarted mailman.
These were all 'recovered' and reprocessed, reproducing the
unparseable message error, and this time moved to qfiles/shunt/*.psv
(so it wouldn't happen again).

This explains why there were over 7500 of these at once, when the
normal rate is /only/ 125 per day.

-- 
Mark Sapiro <mark at msapiro.net>        The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California    better use your sense - B. Dylan