[Mailman-Users] Feature Request: Selective Mass Subscription
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Thu Jul 10 06:36:16 CEST 2008
Cyndi Norwitz writes:
> I appreciate your input. I am curious what other server owners/
> ISP's do. From the talk on this list, it would seem that any
> restriction on what listowners can do is considered a violation.
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to call it a violation, but I would not
want to work under such restrictions myself.
> Assuming you ran a system with users you didn't know well enough to
> judge, what sorts of options would you consider implementing? If
I think that probably what I would consider doing if the market would
bear it, and courts would enforce it, is restrict mass subscription
privileges to people willing to pay upfront for a multi-year contract,
or who pay substantially higher prices for a premium service. If they
violate the TOS, they get no refund. If they've been well-behaved but
want out early, I'd pay them back pro rata. I also wouldn't advertise
the service beyond the bare minimum ... only people who ask for it get
But somebody who's been around for years and is running a reputable
list, hey, that's not that hard to check. I would think it would be
easy enough for them to find out that much about you and your service;
I think they *do* know you well enough.
I'm not criticizing their policy, especially if they're inexpensive,
though. Making such judgments is not cheap.
More information about the Mailman-Users