[Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Mon Oct 12 21:40:20 CEST 2009
Barry Warsaw writes:
> [Your original message probably didn't make it to mailman-developers
> since it was spelled "mailman-devel at python.org" -BAW]
> In general, I like Stephen's proposal as a way to help reduce the
> ambiguity in this very common workflow. I'll bikeshed on this detail:
> I think the header should be called Response-Precedence or maybe List-
Fine with me, either way. I waffled on the name anyway.
> The 'List-*' prefix is evocative of RFC 2369 and since this is a list
> specific header, it should probably be prefixed as such.
It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists,
not users. As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be
> As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have no
> idea how much work is involved. ;)
For anything related to Reply-To/Mail-Followup-To, it's probably a
pretty long road. I wouldn't mind having an RFC in my cv, though.
(It is *not* going to List Domain Signing Policy, though, that can of
worms I'll feed to the fish.)
More information about the Mailman-Users