[Mailman-Users] A modest proposal: Reply-To munging considered *carefully*

[Barry Warsaw]

On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> It's not just list-specific, it's specifically for the use of lists,
> not users.  As such it seems reasonable to me that it would be
> prefixed "List-".
>
>> As for going the RFC route, I think it's not a bad idea, but I have  
>> no
>> idea how much work is involved.  ;)
>
> For anything related to Reply-To/Mail-Followup-To, it's probably a
> pretty long road.  I wouldn't mind having an RFC in my cv, though.
> (It is *not* going to List Domain Signing Policy, though, that can of
> worms I'll feed to the fish.)

Perhaps a good place to start is to write up a draft on wiki.list.org?

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/attachments/20091012/0f2f6312/attachment.pgp>