[Numpy-discussion] Separating out the maskna code

Travis Oliphant travis at continuum.io
Tue May 22 00:34:51 EDT 2012

Just to be clear.   Are we waiting for the conclusion of the PyArray_Diagonal PR before proceeding with this one? 


On May 20, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:

> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
>>> I have not reviewed it in detail, but in general I would be very supportive of your plan to commit this to master, make a 1.7 release (without the ReduceWrapper) function and then work on the masked array / ndarray separation plan for 1.8
>>> Of course, first I would want to hear from Mark, to hear his comments about what was removed.
>> Definitely. I'm pretty sure I didn't accidentally sweep up anything
>> else in my net besides what it says in the commit messages (simply
>> because it's hard to do that when all you're doing is grepping for
>> HASMASKNA and friends), but he knows this code better than I do.
> Also on that note, if someone can merge the PyArray_Diagonal PR then I
> can sort out the conflicts and then make a PR for this, to make review
> easier...
> - N
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list