[Numpy-discussion] NEP process update

[Charles R Harris]

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkwijk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Would be great to have structure, and especially a template - ideally,
> the latter is enough for someone to create a NEP, i.e., has lots of
> in-template documentation.
>
> One thing I'd recommend thinking a little about is to what extend a
> NEP is "frozen" after acceptance. In astropy we've seen situations
> where it helps to clarify details later, and it may be good to think
> beforehand what one wants. In my opinion, one should allow
> clarifications of accepted NEPs, and major editing of ones still
> pending (as happened for __[numpy|array]_ufunc__).
>
> I think the location is secondary, but for what it is worth, I'm not
> fond of the astropy APEs being in a separate repository, mostly
> because I like detailed discussion of everything related in the
> project to happen in one place on github. Also, having to clone a
> repository is yet another hurdle for doing stuff. So, I'd suggest to
> keep the NEPs in the main repository.


+1

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20171206/43a61666/attachment.html>