[Python-cuba] [PSF-Board] Recognition of new working group

[kirby urner]

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:35 AM, kirby urner <kirby.urner at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:51 PM, kirby urner <kirby.urner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:36 PM, David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:
>>
>>> Basically, a working group might spend PSF money, but a SIG probably
>>> won't. Is like that option if it becomes relevant.
>>>
>> I don't want to make it sound like sigs are that easy to get though.  On
> another list we were told to ask a particular email address nicely and we
> might get our sig, but I knew from previous experience with diversity-sig
> and psf-community (which both exist)
>



Sorry, it's psf-volunteers that already exists, pardon the confusion.

The moderator there insinuated our election-related posts are all spam in
his view.

Kirby
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-cuba/attachments/20150514/066618bb/attachment.html>