[Python-Dev] reviewing patches

[Brett Cannon]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:43, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

> Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>
>> This is somewhat covered by components, but it's implicit. Would it be
>> worth making this explicit? I have always wondered if people would be more
>> willing to help out if they could easily search for pure Python code issues
>> if that is as far as they feel comfortable.
>>
>
> If and when I am ready to move from working on documentation issues (which
> seem to becoming fewer as the 3.x transition is completed) to code issues,
> that would be helpful.  What would be really helpful is to have library
> issues tagged and sorted by specific modules (or modules, if more than one),
> but I do not know how that might be done.


It would have to be a text field that people just filled in. Making a list
that had to be kept up-to-date would be a disaster.

But one would hope that simply searching for an issue with a specific module
name would be enough to warrant not having to have the field.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090310/b1a5db3c/attachment-0001.htm>