[Python-Dev] PEP 3148 ready for pronouncement
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat May 29 17:51:52 CEST 2010
On 29/05/10 22:46, Jesse Noller wrote:
> On May 28, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since this topic keeps coming up, some reasoning along these lines
>> should go into PEP 3148.
>
> I'll type something up this weekend and shoot it to Brian for inclusion.
> I was hoping to be able to keep it out of the futures pep itself, but it
> seems that won't work :)
Well, punting on whether or not we actually *do* part 2 is still fine.
As Eric pointed out, there are issues with unpickling that make the
wisdom of following through with renaming any existing modules fairly
questionable.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list