[Python-ideas] Preparing an existing RPC mechanism for the standard library

Leonardo Santagada santagada at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 00:11:37 CET 2008

On 20/03/2008, at 12:45, Guilherme Polo wrote:
> I'm considering the inclusion of rpyc, with appropriate changes
> (possibly lots). And would like to know your opinions towards this.

I think the route you would have to go is making a pep, and one of the  
things I would like to see in this pep would be why rpyc and not any  
of the other rpc modules around (like the not recomended for general  
use zrpc or pyro or the thing the guys from twisted have). Only if  
your pep is accept I think you should waste your time making it better  
for the stdlib.

The two "think" in my last paragraph are there because I am not sure  
this the right route, this is just a guess.

Leonardo Santagada

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list