regex question

[Fredrik Lundh]

Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolmt at smart.net.au> wrote:
> umm .. speaking as an "official person who has never seen the 1.6 regex
> implementation", could you explain what you are talking about?

http://www.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=571652264

> It sounds interesting, but I cannot find anything on the Python website
> about what's on the hotlist for 1.6 (am I going blind?).

the original plan contains lots of stuff, but it may boil
down to unicode, distutils, and assorted bug fixes in 1.6,
and all the rest in 1.7.  or whatever.

I suppose we'll know more after the developer's day
on next week's conference...

</F>