jfarrell at mincom.com
Mon Mar 6 03:07:00 CET 2000
Paul Boddie wrote:
> John Farrell wrote:
> > I suggest
> > the following groups:
> > comp.lang.python
> > comp.lang.python.cgi
> > comp.lang.python.db
> > comp.lang.python.jpython
> > comp.lang.python.tk
> > comp.lang.python.win32
> > comp.lang.python.wx
> > comp.lang.python.zope
> This fragments the discussions far too much,
> comp.lang.python - keep the general group as it is
> comp.lang.python.gui - covers Tk, wxWindows, Gtk, Qt, Win32 etc.
> comp.lang.python.www - Web programming - CGI, ASP etc.
Yep, fine, let's hope that none of those groups want to split real soon
or we would have to go through this again. What's important is that:
* volume on individual groups is decreased
* there are sensible ways to expand the namespace.
Your comp.lang.python.www is a better name than my comp.lang.python.cgi.
> too-much-time-deciding-where-to-post-means-too-little-time-posting-ly y'rs,
Is that bad?
Dr John Farrell - Research Architect - Mincom Limited
I don't suffer from stress. I am a carrier.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d- s++:+ a C+++ U+ P-- L E--- W++ N+(-) o+ !K w---(+) !O !M !V PS+ PE Y?
PGP t--- !5 !X R(+) tv- b++ DI++ D G e++++ h---- r+++ y++++(*)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
This transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential
information. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete
it and notify the sender. The contents of this E-mail are the opinion of the
writer only and are not endorsed by Mincom Limited unless expressly stated
More information about the Python-list