Lexical synchronization (was: Who's minister of propaganda this week?)

[Cameron Laird]

In article <98ph26$5a5 at dispatch.concentric.net>,
Phlip  <phlip_cpp at my-deja.com> wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>> an object is data with code attached
>> a closure is code with data attached
>
>Correct. But a closure declares implicitly, on the spot. That's why you 
>don't have to interrupt your own flow to orchestrate one from scratch, as 
>an object, the way you would in Python or (gods help us) C++.
			.
			.
			.
I've always called this quality "anonymity".  Is
that a private vocabulary, or does anyone else
understand me when I talk that way?
-- 

Cameron Laird <claird at NeoSoft.com>
Business:  http://www.Phaseit.net
Personal:  http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html