A counter-proposal to __future__ in PEP 236

[Tim Peters]

[Alex Martelli]
> ...
> The _semantics_ of PEP 236 are a great idea; I do earnestly hope there
> is some way, ANY way, to avoid its syntax, and this 'directive' idea
> gives me a glimmer of hope...!

ANY way, you say?  OK, the new syntax is

    from __future__ >> nested_scopes

I thought you'd like that better than

    print __future__ << nested_scopes

although both work for me <wink>.