[Spambayes] re-org - making a package &c.

David LeBlanc whisper at oz.net
Fri Jan 10 20:45:53 EST 2003

I thought that the pop3proxy was needed for the outlook application, thus
the "why split" question.

As for putting things in directories, I heartily agree/approve - people who
release things that put things _in_ site-packages ought to be shot ;)

David LeBlanc
Seattle, WA USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Baxter [mailto:anthony at interlink.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 20:18
> To: David LeBlanc
> Cc: spambayes at python.org
> Subject: Re: [Spambayes] re-org - making a package &c.
> >>> "David LeBlanc" wrote
> > Why split it up?
> I'm not sure what 'it' means in this context - if you mean
> 'outlook plugin'
> and 'pop3proxy/hammie', well, they're completely applications, and it's
> unlikely that it would be of use to everyone. On the other hand, it's
> possibly better to have 3 packages - the base "spambayes" one, the outlook
> plugin, and the pop3proxy/hammie package. Not sure.
> If you mean "why reorganise the files into directories - well, as it is
> now, we install a large pile of packages with _very_ generic names into
> site-packages. This is ungood.
> --
> Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

More information about the Spambayes mailing list