[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module

Benjamin Peterson musiccomposition at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 16:12:10 CEST 2008

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/04/2008, Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com> wrote:
> > And here it is: This is my first PEP, so do be brutal with your
> feedback.
> Looks reasonably good - I can't think of anything particularly brutal.
> You should, however, be explicit about precisely where you propose
> each entry in sys should go. Saying "etc..." is cheating :-)

I meant everything which wasn't in the second list won't be moved. EIBTI,

> Once you list everything, I expect you'll get a much more, shall we
> say, "lively" discussion!
> But I've no problem with the PEP in principle.
> Paul.

Benjamin Peterson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/attachments/20080405/775a8fc5/attachment.htm 

More information about the stdlib-sig mailing list