[stdlib-sig] Proposal: new "interpreter" module
musiccomposition at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 16:12:10 CEST 2008
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/04/2008, Benjamin Peterson <musiccomposition at gmail.com> wrote:
> > And here it is: This is my first PEP, so do be brutal with your
> Looks reasonably good - I can't think of anything particularly brutal.
> You should, however, be explicit about precisely where you propose
> each entry in sys should go. Saying "etc..." is cheating :-)
I meant everything which wasn't in the second list won't be moved. EIBTI,
> Once you list everything, I expect you'll get a much more, shall we
> say, "lively" discussion!
> But I've no problem with the PEP in principle.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the stdlib-sig