[Web-SIG] Time a for JSON parser in the standard library?
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Mar 11 03:32:38 CET 2008
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Bennett <ubernostrum at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Mark Ramm <mark.mchristensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would definitely support the incusion of a JSON library in the
> > standard lib. And, I think that it should be simplejson which is
> > used by TurboGears, Pylons, and bundled with Django.
>
> I'd tentatively agree, though I recall seeing a post not long ago
> (which I am currently unable to find) from the author of jsonlib
> lamenting the fact that most of the other JSON modules for Python had
> various significant inconsistencies with the RFC. While authors of
> competing tools should be taken with a grain of salt, I do think
> compliance with the spec is an important factor for any particular
> module that might be blessed with stdlib membership, and so should
> play a bigger role in any such decision than mere benchmark speed.
Well, so fix this. How hard can it be?
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Web-SIG
mailing list