On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:55:58PM -0700, StÃ¯Â¿Â½fan van der Walt wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Nelle Varoquaux
> <nelle.varoquaux(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think scikit-learn decision was to still do the branding with the name
> > "scikits-learn". In that case, I don't think it is necessary to rename the
> > repository.
> > What do you think about it ?
> > If we rename the repository, there's a bit more work to do.
> We're going to keep the scikits-image organisation on GitHub, but I
> think we need to move the source repo to skimage.git (instead of
I think we should move "everything" to skimage, except the name of the
source repo, and the name of the mailing list. A few examples of changes
that could be made (from a 'git grep scikits.image' in Nelle's skimage
TASKS.txt:Developing Open Source is great fun! Join us on the
doc/source/conf.py:copyright = u'2011, scikits-image team'
doc/Makefile: --project-url=http://scikits-image.org \
(now that StÃ¯Â¿Â½fan kindly provided the new domain name!)
and many similar occurrences found by git grep
In some places, we could also use "the Image Scikit", to make clear that
our package is... an image scikit. What do you think?