Mailman 3 July 2013 - scikit-image

Re:
by Ronnie Ghose July 20, 2013

July 20, 2013

Also I was wondering how many you guys were getting - i.e., did I forget to install a component... like i'm going to go add pyamg to the docs next. Actual Error Report: http://pastebin.com/3cSv50YC Thanks, Ronnie On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Ronnie Ghose <ronnie.ghose(a)gmail.com>wrote: > I'm pretty sure the cython files were not build - but let me try now; I > used bentomaker install before though ... does compile the Cython files for > you? > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Josh Warner <silvertrumpet999(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> Correction, that should be `python setup.py build_ext -i`, run at package >> root. >> >> >> On Saturday, July 20, 2013 5:52:21 PM UTC-5, Josh Warner wrote: >>> >>> Run again with `make test` and copy the entire error report, please. >>> That section at the end of coverage just tells us there were 11 errors, not >>> where they came from or why. >>> >>> However, because so few tests were ran I'll go out on a limb and guess >>> the Cython files are not compiled. >>> >>> Try `python build_ext -i` and then running `make test` again; if I'm >>> right that would fix it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Josh >>> >>> On Friday, July 19, 2013 10:53:34 PM UTC-5, Ronnie Ghose wrote: >>>> >>>> how many errors are you getting from `make coverage` ? at the moment >>>> i'm getting: >>>> >>>> . . . >>>> . . . >>>> skimage.viewer.viewers.core 179 142 21% 26-29, >>>> 74-120, 124-139, 142-153, 157-161, 164-166, 176-194, 197, 200-205, 212-214, >>>> 217, 221, 225-239, 242, 246-247, 251, 254-257, 261-266, 298-310, 319-330, >>>> 338, 341-351 >>>> skimage.viewer.widgets 2 0 100% >>>> skimage.viewer.widgets.core 130 103 21% 33-37, >>>> 41-42, 45, 51-59, 63, 67, 99-165, 169-171, 175-186, 189, 192, 196-199, >>>> 203-205, 228-241, 247, 251, 255 >>>> skimage.viewer.widgets.history 70 52 26% 24-39, >>>> 42-44, 48, 55-72, 75-82, 85-92, 96-104 >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>> --------- >>>> TOTAL 3741 1338 64% >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>> ---------- >>>> Ran 243 tests in 4.576s >>>> >>>> FAILED (SKIP=17, errors=11) >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "scikit-image" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > >

1 0

Re:
by Josh Warner July 20, 2013

July 20, 2013

Run again with `make test` and copy the entire error report, please. That section at the end of coverage just tells us there were 11 errors, not where they came from or why. However, because so few tests were ran I'll go out on a limb and guess the Cython files are not compiled. Try `python build_ext -i` and then running `make test` again; if I'm right that would fix it. Regards, Josh On Friday, July 19, 2013 10:53:34 PM UTC-5, Ronnie Ghose wrote: > > how many errors are you getting from `make coverage` ? at the moment i'm > getting: > > . . . > . . . > skimage.viewer.viewers.core 179 142 21% 26-29, > 74-120, 124-139, 142-153, 157-161, 164-166, 176-194, 197, 200-205, 212-214, > 217, 221, 225-239, 242, 246-247, 251, 254-257, 261-266, 298-310, 319-330, > 338, 341-351 > skimage.viewer.widgets 2 0 100% > skimage.viewer.widgets.core 130 103 21% 33-37, > 41-42, 45, 51-59, 63, 67, 99-165, 169-171, 175-186, 189, 192, 196-199, > 203-205, 228-241, 247, 251, 255 > skimage.viewer.widgets.history 70 52 26% 24-39, > 42-44, 48, 55-72, 75-82, 85-92, 96-104 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > TOTAL 3741 1338 64% > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 243 tests in 4.576s > > FAILED (SKIP=17, errors=11) > > >

2 2

(no subject)
by Ronnie Ghose July 20, 2013

July 20, 2013

how many errors are you getting from `make coverage` ? at the moment i'm getting: . . . . . . skimage.viewer.viewers.core 179 142 21% 26-29, 74-120, 124-139, 142-153, 157-161, 164-166, 176-194, 197, 200-205, 212-214, 217, 221, 225-239, 242, 246-247, 251, 254-257, 261-266, 298-310, 319-330, 338, 341-351 skimage.viewer.widgets 2 0 100% skimage.viewer.widgets.core 130 103 21% 33-37, 41-42, 45, 51-59, 63, 67, 99-165, 169-171, 175-186, 189, 192, 196-199, 203-205, 228-241, 247, 251, 255 skimage.viewer.widgets.history 70 52 26% 24-39, 42-44, 48, 55-72, 75-82, 85-92, 96-104 --------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL 3741 1338 64% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 243 tests in 4.576s FAILED (SKIP=17, errors=11)

1 0

Re: color difference functions
by Matt Terry July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013

Sounds good. I'll send a PR when I get the tests finished. -matt On Friday, July 19, 2013 2:03:58 AM UTC-7, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > Hi Matt > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Matt Terry <matt....(a)gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Would color difference functions [1] be of interest to skimage? I have > the > > distance functions for CIE76, CIEDE94, CIEDE2000 and CMC l:c if you > think > > the would be of general interest. > > Those fit in very well with the scope of the ``skimage.color`` module. > I think especially if we can have docstrings that teach the user a > bit more about the topic, this would be highly useful in the classroom > too. > > Stéfan >

1 0

color difference functions
by Matt Terry July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013

Hi, Would color difference functions [1] be of interest to skimage? I have the distance functions for CIE76, CIEDE94, CIEDE2000 and CMC l:c if you think the would be of general interest. -matt [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_difference

2 1

Re: IRC Channel
by Stéfan van der Walt July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Ronnie Ghose <ronnie.ghose(a)gmail.com> wrote: > is there no IRC channel for scikit-image? if not - why? There is #skimage on freenode.net, but not a lot of activity. Stéfan

1 0

Re: IRC Channel
by Johannes Schönberger July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013

I can only speak for myself, but I personally do not use IRC… Johannes Schönberger Am 19.07.2013 um 03:48 schrieb Ronnie Ghose <ronnie.ghose(a)gmail.com>: > is there no IRC channel for scikit-image? if not - why? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >

1 0

IRC Channel
by Ronnie Ghose July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013

is there no IRC channel for scikit-image? if not - why?

1 0

Re: Failed to import LineModel, ransac
by Michael Aye July 18, 2013

July 18, 2013

> > > I didn't think EPD offered dev versions of packages. I can only see 0.8.2. > In any case, it depends on how recently the dev version was updated. The > RANSAC code was only merged into master about 2 months ago. (Any pulls from > master in the last 4 months will be labeled 0.9dev.) > Yeah, sorry for that. Must have pulled master in at sometime for some interesting feature. I am still regularly confused by the fact that enpkg --remove does leave the egg in site-packages, and for some reason I don't have the git folder of skimage anymore, so I thought it must have come via enpkg.

1 0

ImportError: cannot import name LineModel
by Fabian Peña Arellano July 18, 2013

July 18, 2013

Dear all, I am trying to run the ransac model estimation example given on the documentation. However, Python cannot load the line model: Traceback (most recent call last): File "plot_ransac.py", line 13, in <module> from skimage.measure import LineModel, ransac ImportError: cannot import name LineModel I am using the latest stable version 0.8.2 in Ubuntu. Are the LineModel and ransac routines available on the development version only? Thank you very much in advance. Regards, Fabián

2 1