docs September 2011

docs@python.org

29 participants
251 discussions

[issue12188] PEP 7, C style: add ++ policy and explanation

by Terry J. Reedy

New submission from Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy(a)udel.edu>: In response to a discussion of a patch removing 'useless' post-increments, (which issue has apparently come up before) Guido posted "> Sorry to butt in here, but I agree with Eric that it was better > before. There is a common idiom, *pointer++ =<something>, and > whenever you see that you know that you are appending something to an > output buffer. Perhaps the most important idea here is that this > maintains the *invariant* "pointer points just after the last thing in > the buffer". Always maintaining the invariant is better than trying to > micro-optimize things so as to avoid updating dead values. The > compiler is better at that." A condensed version of the above added to PEP 7 would help new developers see the usage as local idiom rather than style bug. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 136991 nosy: docs@python, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PEP 7, C style: add ++ policy and explanation _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12188> _______________________________________

1 year, 5 months

[issue11001] Various obvious errors in cookies documentation

by Luke Plant

New submission from Luke Plant <L.Plant.98(a)cantab.net>: Docs for SimpleCookie, BaseCookie.value_encode and BaseCookie.value_decode are obviously incorrect. Attempt at patch attached. The error has existed in every Python version I've seen, I've tagged the ones I believe can receive fixes, sorry if I've made a mistake. Thanks. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: http_cookies_doc_corrections.diff keywords: patch messages: 126962 nosy: docs@python, spookylukey priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Various obvious errors in cookies documentation versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20507/http_cookies_doc_corrections.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11001> _______________________________________

1 year, 5 months

[issue10789] Lock.acquire documentation is misleading

by Jyrki Pulliainen

New submission from Jyrki Pulliainen <jyrki(a)dywypi.org>: In threading module, the Lock.acquire documentation is misleading. The signature suggests that the blocking can be given as a keyword argument but that would lead to an TypeError, as thread.lock.acquire does not accept keyword arguments. The signature in documentation should be formatted as in thread.lock.acquire. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 124861 nosy: Jyrki.Pulliainen, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Lock.acquire documentation is misleading versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10789> _______________________________________

1 year, 6 months

[issue10048] urllib.request documentation confusing

by Antoine Pitrou

New submission from Antoine Pitrou <pitrou(a)free.fr>: The urllib.request documentation intermingles old 2.x urllib (FancyURLopener, etc.) with urllib2-inherited (*Handler, build_opener, etc.) primitives without making any distinction. This makes it rather confusing for the reader to figure out which ones to use. Ideally, the use of the old primitives should also be discouraged. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 118179 nosy: docs@python, orsenthil, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: urllib.request documentation confusing versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10048> _______________________________________

1 year, 6 months

[issue12957] mmap.resize changes memory address of mmap'd region

by Michael Schurter

New submission from Michael Schurter <m(a)schmichael.com>: Since mmap.resize uses MREMAP_MAYMOVE on Linux, it would be nice to warn users that pointers into their memory mapped regions will be invalid after resizes. Linux's manpage offers the following explanation: "If the mapping is relocated, then absolute pointers into the old mapping location become invalid (offsets relative to the starting address of the mapping should be employed)." Since the only way I know of to use pointers into mmaps from pure Python is to use ctypes.<type>.from_buffer(<mmap>), perhaps clarification would be better in the ctypes docs. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: killctypes.py messages: 143845 nosy: docs@python, schmichael priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: mmap.resize changes memory address of mmap'd region type: feature request versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file23126/killctypes.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12957> _______________________________________

1 year, 6 months

[issue11176] give more meaningful argument names in argparse documentation

by Steven Bethard

New submission from Steven Bethard <steven.bethard(a)gmail.com>: Suggestion from a personal email: I personally am not keen on the foo/bar/baz examples. I know that you're trying to be generic but IMO it would be much easier to understand if you used meaningful names. Also, I think that the very first example you give (which does use meaningful names:-) is too clever. I'd suggest using something simpler: in fact I'd use exactly the same example that optparse uses (--file && --quiet) since that is easy to understand and relate to straight away, and maybe add a --line option that takes a list of ints (ostensibly line numbers of lines to extract from the file) if you want to show that argparse leaves optparse in the dust. And you can always show how to get actual file objects later on. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 128302 nosy: bethard, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: give more meaningful argument names in argparse documentation type: feature request versions: Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11176> _______________________________________

1 year, 6 months

[issue13074] Improve documentation of locale encoding functions

by Geoffrey Bache

New submission from Geoffrey Bache <gjb1002(a)users.sourceforge.net>: The locale module provides locale.getdefaultlocale and locale.getpreferredencoding. The encodings returned by each are generally subtly different ('ISO8859-1' vs 'ISO-8859-1'), but the difference between these methods is not explained. A comment by Martin von Löwis from 2003 in http://bugs.python.org/issue813449 indicates that "getdefaultlocale should not be used in new code", if this is really the case then this should be in the docs. Anyone reading the docs from the top will currently encounter getdefaultlocale first and believe that this is the way to get the encoding. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 144677 nosy: docs@python, gjb1002 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Improve documentation of locale encoding functions versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13074> _______________________________________

1 year, 7 months

[issue8822] datetime naive and aware types should have a well-defined definition that can be cross-referenced

by anatoly techtonik

New submission from anatoly techtonik <techtonik(a)gmail.com>: 'naive' and 'aware' are key datetime types - they need a proper definition and anchor for crossrefences. If you take a look at http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html - the definition of distinction between them is too vague and this seeds of uncertainty grow through the rest of the doc. It is not said how to make non-naive object, how to detect if object of naive or aware. All this stuff is very important for troubleshooting datetims issues in Python projects. It needs a proper documentation. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 106524 nosy: docs@python, techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: datetime naive and aware types should have a well-defined definition that can be cross-referenced _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8822> _______________________________________

1 year, 7 months

[issue11776] types.MethodType() params and usage is not documented

by anatoly techtonik

New submission from anatoly techtonik <techtonik(a)gmail.com>: types.MethodType(function, instance) is used as a replacement for new.instancemethod(function, instance, class), but this usage is not documented. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 133089 nosy: docs@python, techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: types.MethodType() params and usage is not documented versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11776> _______________________________________

1 year, 8 months

[issue11352] Buf in cgi module doc

by Pierre Quentel

New submission from Pierre Quentel <pierre.quentel(a)gmail.com>: Hi, I wrote a patch for the cgi module in version 3.2rc1 (#4953). Small changes should be done to the documentation of this module to reflect the changes in the module API : - in section "20.2.2. Using the cgi module" original text : "If a field represents an uploaded file, accessing the value via the value attribute or the getvalue() method reads the entire file in memory as a string. This may not be what you want. You can test for an uploaded file by testing either the filename attribute or the file attribute. You can then read the data at leisure from the file attribute:" proposed new text (for files, value is bytes, not string, and the read() method on file also returns bytes) : "If a field represents an uploaded file, accessing the value via the value attribute or the getvalue() method reads the entire file in memory as bytes. This may not be what you want. You can test for an uploaded file by testing either the filename attribute or the file attribute. You can then read the data at leisure from the file attribute (the read() and readline() methods will return bytes) :" - version 3.2 introduced a parameter "encoding" for the FieldStorage constructor, used to decode the bytes received on the HTTP connection for fields other than files. This encoding must the one defined in the HTML document holding the form submitted to the CGI script ; it is usually defined by a meta tag : <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=latin-1"> or by the Content-Type header for this document I'm not sure where this should be mentioned in the module documentation. Maybe in "20.2.9. Common problems and solutions" for the moment. But there are plans (#11066) to introduce another interface to change the encoding of sys.stdout in the CGI script itself, so another option would be to open a specific section about encodings Hope it's clear enough Pierre ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 129691 nosy: docs@python, quentel priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Buf in cgi module doc type: behavior versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11352> _______________________________________

1 year, 8 months

Jump to page:

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

docs September 2011