Mailman 3 May 2016 - docs

[issue16834] ioctl mutate_flag behavior in regard to the buffer size limit
by Yuval Weinbaum Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

New submission from Yuval Weinbaum: In fcntl module, the documentation states the following regarding the mutate_flag in ioctl method: *** If it is false, the buffer’s mutability is ignored and behaviour is as for a read-only buffer, except that the 1024 byte limit mentioned above is avoided – so long as the buffer you pass is as least as long as what the operating system wants to put there, things should work. *** However, looking at the code (fcntlmodule.c) it seems that the 1024 bytes limitation is avoided when the mutate_flag is set to True (the opposite of what is stated in the doc). ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 178732 nosy: Yuval.Weinbaum, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: ioctl mutate_flag behavior in regard to the buffer size limit versions: Python 2.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16834> _______________________________________

4 4

[issue11176] give more meaningful argument names in argparse documentation
by Steven Bethard Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

New submission from Steven Bethard <steven.bethard(a)gmail.com>: Suggestion from a personal email: I personally am not keen on the foo/bar/baz examples. I know that you're trying to be generic but IMO it would be much easier to understand if you used meaningful names. Also, I think that the very first example you give (which does use meaningful names:-) is too clever. I'd suggest using something simpler: in fact I'd use exactly the same example that optparse uses (--file && --quiet) since that is easy to understand and relate to straight away, and maybe add a --line option that takes a list of ints (ostensibly line numbers of lines to extract from the file) if you want to show that argparse leaves optparse in the dust. And you can always show how to get actual file objects later on. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 128302 nosy: bethard, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: give more meaningful argument names in argparse documentation type: feature request versions: Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11176> _______________________________________

13 23

[issue12436] Provide reference to detailed installation instructions
by Nick Coghlan Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

New submission from Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan(a)gmail.com>: The Boston Python Workshop folks have some detailed step-by-step instructions on getting Python up and running ([1]). Given that this can be a pain point for new users (primarily on Windows), it may be good to reference these instructions from the official docs. (Alternatively, we could use them as the basis for a "HOWTO" in the official docs and update release.py to adjust the relevant links. That's a lot more work than just adding a link, though) [1] http://openhatch.org/wiki/Boston_Python_Workshop_3/Friday ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 139381 nosy: docs@python, ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Provide reference to detailed installation instructions _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12436> _______________________________________

10 28

[issue13122] Out of date links in the sidebar of the documentation index of versions 3.1 and 3.2
by Sven Marnach Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

New submission from Sven Marnach <sven(a)marnach.net>: The sidebar on http://docs.python.org/release/3.1.3/ names 3.2 as the development version of Python, while the link points to 3.3. The sidebar on http://docs.python.org/py3k/ links to 3.1 as the "stable version" -- obviously a relict from the time when 3.2 was in development. (This could be fixed in Doc/tools/sphinxext/indexsidebar.html of the respective branches.) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 145084 nosy: docs@python, smarnach priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Out of date links in the sidebar of the documentation index of versions 3.1 and 3.2 versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13122> _______________________________________

8 13

[issue11346] Generator object should be mentioned in gc module document
by Atsuo Ishimoto Nov. 6, 2020

Nov. 6, 2020

New submission from Atsuo Ishimoto <ishimoto(a)gembook.org>: In the gc.garbage of the library ref of gc module, ... this list contains only objects with __del__() methods. This is not true, since gc.garbage will contain generator object with try-finally block. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 129631 nosy: docs@python, ishimoto priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Generator object should be mentioned in gc module document _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11346> _______________________________________

4 4

[issue26205] Inconsistency concerning nested scopes
by Roscoe R.Higgins Nov. 4, 2020

Nov. 4, 2020

New submission from Roscoe R.Higgins: In chapter 9. Classes of the Python3.5 documentation it says: "At any time during execution, there are at least three nested scopes whose namespaces are directly accessible:", followed by a list containing 4 items. Further down a middle scope is mentioned (although mentioned by name). This was confusing for a while. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 258941 nosy: Roscoe R. Higgins, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Inconsistency concerning nested scopes type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26205> _______________________________________

10 26

[issue14379] Several traceback docs improvements
by anatoly techtonik Nov. 4, 2020

Nov. 4, 2020

New submission from anatoly techtonik <techtonik(a)gmail.com>: Some notes about current `traceback` documentation: http://docs.python.org/library/traceback.html 1. It needs a mentioning that traceback module works with traceback objects and frame objects 2. Functions that work with frames should probably be grouped together 3. Docs for frame function should include info about where to get frames (e.g. http://docs.python.org/library/inspect.html#the-interpreter-stack) 4. There is no traceback object description, which should be at http://docs.python.org/library/sys.html#sys.exc_info ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 156486 nosy: docs@python, techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Several traceback docs improvements _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14379> _______________________________________

4 4

[issue9499] Python C/API Execution namespace undocumented. (patch included)
by Campbell Barton Nov. 2, 2020

Nov. 2, 2020

New submission from Campbell Barton <ideasman42(a)gmail.com>: Some parts of the python api expect __main__ module dictionary to be the namespace when executing a script, this is true when running a python script from the python binary but NOT true when running a compiled script from the C/API which can lead to bugs which are not easy to solve unless the C/API author knows this. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: doc_py3_main_mod.diff keywords: patch messages: 112706 nosy: docs@python, ideasman42 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python C/API Execution namespace undocumented. (patch included) type: behavior versions: Python 3.2 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18357/doc_py3_main_mod.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9499> _______________________________________

3 4

[issue14219] start the Class tutorial in a more gentle manner
by Tshepang Lekhonkhobe Oct. 31, 2020

Oct. 31, 2020

New submission from Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <tshepang(a)gmail.com>: Looking at Doc/tutorial/classes, the section "Python Scopes and Namespaces" is full of heavy/deep information. I expect that people who would be able to properly digest that info are people who are already advanced at Python, and therefore maybe it should be moved to some cookbook (or language reference). I would prefer something gentler, since the tutorial is for Python newbies who aren't necessarily conversant with OO concepts. There can of course be links to heavier material for deeper understanding. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 155065 nosy: docs@python, tshepang priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: start the Class tutorial in a more gentle manner type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14219> _______________________________________

4 5

[issue21078] multiprocessing.managers.BaseManager.__init__'s "serializer" argument is not documented
by Yuriy Taraday Oct. 30, 2020

Oct. 30, 2020

New submission from Yuriy Taraday: We're going to use BaseManager for simple secure local RPC and for the "secure" part we can't use pickle, so we have to use "serializer" argument to switch to xmlrpclib. We need to be sure that argument won't go away so we need it to be documented and supported on future versions. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 214967 nosy: docs@python, yorik.sar priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: multiprocessing.managers.BaseManager.__init__'s "serializer" argument is not documented versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21078> _______________________________________

5 7