Mailman 3 June 2018 - docs

[issue33766] Grammar Incongruence
by miss-islington June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com> added the comment: New changeset f01b951a0e70f36ca2a3caa043f89a5277bb0bb0 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '2.7': bpo-33766: Document that end of file or string is a newline (GH-7383) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f01b951a0e70f36ca2a3caa043f89a5277… ---------- nosy: +miss-islington _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33766> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue33766] Grammar Incongruence
by miss-islington June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +7201 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33766> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue33766] Grammar Incongruence
by miss-islington June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +7200 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33766> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue33766] Grammar Incongruence
by miss-islington June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +7199 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33766> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue33766] Grammar Incongruence
by Terry J. Reedy June 10, 2018

June 10, 2018

Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy(a)udel.edu> added the comment: New changeset 0aa17ee6a76df0946d42e7657a501f1862065a22 by Terry Jan Reedy (Ammar Askar) in branch 'master': bpo-33766: Document that end of file or string is a newline (GH-7383) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0aa17ee6a76df0946d42e7657a501f1862… ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33766> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue31711] ssl.SSLSocket.send(b"") fails
by Roundup Robot June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

Change by Roundup Robot <devnull(a)psf.upfronthosting.co.za>: ---------- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +7191 stage: needs patch -> patch review _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31711> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue31215] Add version changed notes for OpenSSL 1.1.0 compatibility
by Nick Coghlan June 9, 2018

June 9, 2018

New submission from Nick Coghlan: https://bugs.python.org/issue26470 updated the ssl and hashlib modules in 2.7 and 3.5+ to be compatible with OpenSSL 1.1.0. However, it's currently unclear what the *minimum* versions actually are for platforms that want to drop support for OpenSSL 1.0.x, and it's particularly unclear in 2.7, as that lacks the deprecation warning for OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 that was introduced in Python 3.6. This doesn't rise to the level of something to be documented as a new feature in the 2.7 What's New, but I think a version changed note in the opening section of the `ssl` module documentation would be appropriate: 2.7 branch: .. versionchanged: 2.7.13 Updated to support linking with OpenSSL 1.1.0 3.6 and master branches (immediately before the 3.6 deprecation notice): .. versionchanged: 3.5.3 Updated to support linking with OpenSSL 1.1.0 ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 300326 nosy: christian.heimes, docs@python, ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Add version changed notes for OpenSSL 1.1.0 compatibility type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.6, Python 3.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31215> _______________________________________

5 11

[issue33801] Remove non-ordered dict comment from plistlib
by Andrés Delfino June 8, 2018

June 8, 2018

New submission from Andrés Delfino <adelfino(a)gmail.com>: plistlib documentation says: "The exact structure of the plist can be recovered by using collections.OrderedDict (although the order of keys shouldn't be important in plist files)" This is no longer necessary, since dict objects preserve insertion order. PR changes this. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 318969 nosy: adelfino, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Remove non-ordered dict comment from plistlib type: enhancement versions: Python 3.7, Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33801> _______________________________________

3 5

[issue33799] Remove non-ordered dicts comments from FAQ
by Andrés Delfino June 8, 2018

June 8, 2018

New submission from Andrés Delfino <adelfino(a)gmail.com>: Both Design and Programming sections have comments related to the non-ordered dict implementation. PR removes those comments. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 318964 nosy: adelfino, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Remove non-ordered dicts comments from FAQ versions: Python 3.7, Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33799> _______________________________________

4 5

[issue33771] Module: timeit. According to documentation default_repeat should have the value 3. Has 5.
by Cheryl Sabella June 8, 2018

June 8, 2018

New submission from Cheryl Sabella <cheryl.sabella(a)gmail.com>: Looks like this was changed in #28240. @svyatoslav, would you like to make a github pull request for the change? ---------- keywords: +easy nosy: +cheryl.sabella stage: -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33771> _______________________________________

3 4