python-committers March 2011

python-committers@python.org

26 participants
13 discussions

anyone still have access to the coverity scan results?
by Brett Cannon 19 Aug '12

19 Aug '12

Access to the Python results is currently down, but has anyone actually accessed the Coverity scan results any time recently? Or who even has access anymore?

9 20

PEPs repo converted
by Georg Brandl 26 Mar '11

26 Mar '11

Please commit any PEP changes to hg.python.org/peps. Also, sorry for the span on -checkins, I should not have enabled the notification hook before pushing all changes :) Georg

5 10

There are two versions of the Contributor Agreement
by Victor Stinner 24 Mar '11

24 Mar '11

http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form-python/ and http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ It looks like the first one is old, because http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ points to the second one. Victor

5 5

Re: [python-committers] Recording committer status in the bug tracker
by Steve Holden 16 Mar '11

16 Mar '11

Yes, I can. Thanks, Pat regards Steve On Mar 16, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hi Steve: > > Are you able to read the attached spreadsheet? > Thanks, > Pat > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Steve Holden <steve(a)holdenweb.com> wrote: > Pat: > > It appears that our contributor agreement records are not complete. Do you have a list of people for whom we hold a signed agreement, please? > > regards > Steve > > On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > > On Mar 16, 2011, at 06:14 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > > > >> Time it did, then. Anything the Foundation can do to help? > > > > How about posting a list of people for which you have verified contributor > > forms on record? I'm in the same boat as Fred. I'm nearly certain I signed a > > contributor form way back when, but I also heard some got lost. If I need to > > sign another one, I'm happy (and legally able) to. > > > > -Barry > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers(a)python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam(a)python.org > <ContributorAgreements-'-09, '10, & '11.xls>

1 0

Recording committer status in the bug tracker
by "Martin v. Löwis" 16 Mar '11

16 Mar '11

I added a boolean flag to the bug tracker indicating what user accounts belong to committers. Please check that the flag is set in Your Details, Is Committer. If it's not, please let me know. Regards, Martin

8 10

[Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
by Antoine Pitrou 13 Mar '11

13 Mar '11

What is the process now? Is it a showstopper? -------- Message transféré -------- De: Pat Campbell <patcam(a)python.org> À: Antoine Pitrou <solipsis(a)pitrou.net> Cc: Steve Holden <steve(a)holdenweb.com> Sujet: Re: [python-committers] Push rights for Ross Lagerwall Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:54:29 -0500 Hi All: I have not received a contributor agreement for Ross Lagerwall yet. It maybe in transit at this point. However, if the need arises another can be sent directly to me at: PSF c/o Pat Campbell 6306 Treetop Circle Tampa, Florida 33617 Thanks, Pat On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis(a)pitrou.net> wrote: Absolutely no idea. Either very recently, or earlier. Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 11:07 -0500, Pat Campbell a écrit : > Hi All: > > When should it have come in? > > Thanks, > Pat > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Steve Holden <steve(a)holdenweb.com> > wrote: > Pat should know if we have received one. > > regards > Steve > > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > Le mardi 08 mars 2011 à 00:57 -0800, Raymond Hettinger a > écrit : > > > >> > >> Do we have a signed contributor agreement? > > > > I've told Ross it would be nice to send one if he hadn't > already done > > so, but I have obviously no way of checking whether he did > or not. > > > > Regards > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > python-committers mailing list > > python-committers(a)python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > > > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam(a)python.org -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam(a)python.org

10 39

Re: [python-committers] Push rights for Ross Lagerwall
by Giampaolo Rodolà 08 Mar '11

08 Mar '11

Antoine Pitrou ha scritto: > Hello, > > Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both >bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like > to propose him as a committer (is this still the appropriate word?). > > Regards > > Antoine. +1 from me as well. http://bugs.python.org/issue10812 and others such as sendfile() addition are some valuable pieces of work. --- Giampaolo http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/ http://code.google.com/p/psutil/

4 3

Roundup integration hook added
by Georg Brandl 08 Mar '11

08 Mar '11

Thanks to Kelsey Hightower, we now have a hook that notifies Roundup of commit messages that reference issues. *** To make this work, you need to use a hg user name in the form *** "User Name <email@address>" AND make sure Roundup knows of this *** email address. To check this, go to "Your Details" in Roundup *** and make sure the address is either in "E-mail address" or in *** "Alternate E-mail addresses". Then if you put "#12345", "issue 12345" or "issue12345" in a commit message, this commit message will be added as a comment on the Roundup issue with a link to the changeset when it is pushed to the central repo. If you prefix this with one of "close", "closing", "closed", "closes" (or the same verb forms of "fix"), the issue will also be closed automatically. Please let us know of any bugs you encounter. Georg

1 0

Re: [python-committers] Use hg commit --user?
by Steve Holden 07 Mar '11

07 Mar '11

On Mar 6, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>> Le dimanche 06 mars 2011 à 13:19 -0500, Steve Holden a écrit : >>>> In short, if someone isn't able to sign a contributor agreement we >>>> should ask ourselves whether it's really appropriate to incorporate >>>> their contributions into the code base. >>> >>> What do you mean with "isn't able"? Surely everyone is physically and >>> technically able to do so :) >>> Now, if someone (such as Anatoly) actively *refuses* to sign an >>> agreement when asked to, I agree they might not be reliable. But I don't >>> think that's the case we're talking about. >> >> I meant "isn't able" in the sense that the would-be contributor >> doesn't have rights in the code they seek to contribute. > > Ok, but how do you know that, if they still sign an agreement? There isn't much we can do about people willfully lying to us. This does not relieve us of the obligation to try and ensure that contributions are covered by a contributor agreement. > >>>> If you make checkins of other people's code you should be as certain >>>> as you can that you have the right to include it - since your >>>> contributor agreement states that you assign to the PSF the right to >>>> relicense your contributions. >>> >>> I don't understand your reasoning. When I check in someone else's work, >>> the author of the checkin is mostly someone else (I guess under the hood >>> it may be more complicated, in French law it might be called a >>> "composite work" or a "collective work", but let's try to ignore that). >>> So *my* contributor agreement can't apply to the checkin since it is >>> only valid for my own contributions. >> >> We'll need to get advice on this: if you are adding the code to the >> code base then it is surely covered by your contributor agreement >> (assuming you are adding the "this code provided under a contributor >> agreement" notice as requested in the developer notes). If you aren't, >> then shouldn't you be? > > Sorry, I don't understand your question: shouldn't I be what? > Shouldn't you be adding the notice? > As for the "this code provided under a contributor agreement" notice, I > haven't seen it added in a long time (neither by me nor by anyone else). > I'm not convinced it should pollute our commit messages and/or our code > files (since it would end up basically anywhere, or at least that's the > desired effect). > >> If you aren't happy that you have the rights to do that then I don't >> believe you should be checking in those contributions because they may >> threaten to encumber code we are licensing to third parties. > > I'm not unhappy with it. I'm simply quite sure that an agreement I have > signed cannot be forced on a third-party (the submitter and main author > of the checked in code) who hasn't signed it. Legally, I mean. > >>>> Wouldn't it be easier and more straightforward to have these people >>>> sign contributor agreements even if you continue to check in their >>>> code? >>> >>> Well, between mandating the signature of an agreement, and not mandating >>> said signature, I think the easiest and most straightforward (both for >>> them - who have to sign it -, for us - who have to check that an >>> agreement exists -, and for the PSF - who has to gather and record said >>> agreements) is the latter. All other things being equal, that is. >> >> "The latter" meaning requiring contributor agreements? I hope so, but >> language is rarely as clear as we would wish. > > No, "the latter" meant "not mandating said signature". OK. As far as I am concerned, adding code to the repository that is not covered by a contributor agreement is a recipe for disaster, and I would like to hear what other committers think. I'm not sure how or when the committers list was dropped from our conversation, but I hope you don't mind me adding it back for that purpose. regards Steve

5 4

Push rights for Ross Lagerwall
by Antoine Pitrou 06 Mar '11

06 Mar '11

Hello, Ross Logerwall has been contributing patches for several months (both bug fixes and new features). 28 changesets bear his name. I would like to propose him as a committer (is this still the appropriate word?). Regards Antoine.

5 4

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

python-committers March 2011