Mailman 3 October 2012 - scikit-image

Cython fused types
by Johannes Schönberger Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

Hi, I'm not sure if everyone has already noticed, that there is support for "fused types" in the recently released Cython 0.17 (http://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/fusedtypes.html). This may be extremely useful to support different dtypes without doing a explicit conversion of arrays. It's probably too early to use this feature as it is still marked as "experimental"... but we should consider to use this feature in future. Regards, Johannes

2 1

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Stéfan van der Walt Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mathieu Blondel <mathieu(a)mblondel.org> wrote: > I would be interested in tackling seam-carving at some point. I have code > that I could reuse (perhaps, the dynamic programming part could be rewritten > in Cython): > http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2010/02/09/seam-carving-in-python/ Neat! Long ago I tried using the minimum cost paths inside skimage: https://github.com/stefanv/scikit-image/blob/seam_carving/doc/examples/plot… Unfortunately, this is also way too slow; we'll need to do some Cython to track the removed paths somehow. Stéfan

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Mathieu Blondel Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

I would be interested in tackling seam-carving at some point. I have code that I could reuse (perhaps, the dynamic programming part could be rewritten in Cython): http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2010/02/09/seam-carving-in-python/ Mathieu

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Stéfan van der Walt Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Tony Yu <tsyu80(a)gmail.com> wrote: > But for branding, I'm inclined to use the longer "scikit-image" whenever > possible, so I'd be in favor of having skimage.org redirect to > scikit-image.org. It's not that big of a deal, but that's my take. It has been done... Now, on to graph cuts, blind deconvolution, in-painting, seam-carving, temporal highlighting, FFT-painting, panorama stitching, HDR mapping, binary features, and saving the world! Stéfan

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Tony Yu Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za>wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian Holt <bdholt1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I would actually rather go with scikit-image.org as the domain name > > reflecting the name of the project. It's what I would expect most users > > would search for as well. > > The domain is there and redirects to skimage.org as is. > > Stéfan > I kind of see "skimage" as a practical name to use in code---both for shorter imports and to avoid the issue with namespace packages. But for branding, I'm inclined to use the longer "scikit-image" whenever possible, so I'd be in favor of having skimage.org redirect to scikit-image.org. It's not that big of a deal, but that's my take. -Tony

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Stéfan van der Walt Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian Holt <bdholt1(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I would actually rather go with scikit-image.org as the domain name > reflecting the name of the project. It's what I would expect most users > would search for as well. The domain is there and redirects to skimage.org as is. Stéfan

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Johannes Schönberger Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

+1 for scikit-image.org Johannes Schönberger Am 04.10.2012 um 19:38 schrieb Brian Holt <bdholt1(a)gmail.com>: I would actually rather go with scikit-image.org as the domain name reflecting the name of the project. It's what I would expect most users would search for as well. Brian On Oct 4, 2012 6:24 PM, "Stéfan van der Walt" <stefan(a)sun.ac.za> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, James Bergstra > <james.bergstra(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 on skimage for repo (maybe github organization, maybe not) and python > import name. > > > > Ditto for scikit-learn (sklearn repo and import). Wasn't the purpose of > this renaming to team up with scikit-learn? > > Teaming up, in the sense of having a more unified brand, yes. > > At the moment we have: > > http://skimage.org -> website > https://github.com/scikit-image -> org > https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image -> repo > > I am OK with the repo having a slightly longer name, since I almost > never have to type that in :) > > Stéfan > > -- > > > --

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Brian Holt Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

I would actually rather go with scikit-image.org as the domain name reflecting the name of the project. It's what I would expect most users would search for as well. Brian On Oct 4, 2012 6:24 PM, "Stéfan van der Walt" <stefan(a)sun.ac.za> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, James Bergstra > <james.bergstra(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 on skimage for repo (maybe github organization, maybe not) and python > import name. > > > > Ditto for scikit-learn (sklearn repo and import). Wasn't the purpose of > this renaming to team up with scikit-learn? > > Teaming up, in the sense of having a more unified brand, yes. > > At the moment we have: > > http://skimage.org -> website > https://github.com/scikit-image -> org > https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image -> repo > > I am OK with the repo having a slightly longer name, since I almost > never have to type that in :) > > Stéfan > > -- > > >

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by Stéfan van der Walt Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, James Bergstra <james.bergstra(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 on skimage for repo (maybe github organization, maybe not) and python import name. > > Ditto for scikit-learn (sklearn repo and import). Wasn't the purpose of this renaming to team up with scikit-learn? Teaming up, in the sense of having a more unified brand, yes. At the moment we have: http://skimage.org -> website https://github.com/scikit-image -> org https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image -> repo I am OK with the repo having a slightly longer name, since I almost never have to type that in :) Stéfan

1 0

Re: Domain name: skimage.org vs scikit-image.org
by James Bergstra Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

+1 on skimage for repo (maybe github organization, maybe not) and python import name. Ditto for scikit-learn (sklearn repo and import). Wasn't the purpose of this renaming to team up with scikit-learn? On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis(a)gmail.com> wrote: > +1 on skimage > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan(a)sun.ac.za>wrote: > >> Hi, everyone >> >> The conversation on GitHub with Mathieu refers. I quite like " >> skimage.org" as a domain name because of its brevity, but I would like >> to hear the opinion of the rest of the team. If you prefer " >> scikit-image.org" because it is more descriptive, I'll change the setup >> accordingly. >> >> Stéfan >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Mathieu Blondel <notifications(a)github.com> >> Date: Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:31 AM >> Subject: Re: [scikit-image] Change domain name (#342) >> To: scikit-image/scikit-image <scikit-image(a)noreply.github.com> >> Cc: Stefan van der Walt <sjvdwalt(a)gmail.com> >> >> >> In doc/source/themes/scikit-image/layout.html: >> >> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ >> > {%- block extrahead %}{% endblock %} >> > </head> >> > <body class="container"> >> > - <a href="http://scikit-image.org" class="logo"><img src="{{ pathto('_static/', 1) }}img/logo.png" alt=""></a> >> > + <a href="http://skimage.org" class="logo"><img src="{{ pathto('_static/', 1) }}img/logo.png" alt=""></a> >> >> So are you planning to use skimage.org as the main domain name? I >> suspect that most people will start calling the project skimage if you >> do so... >> >> — >> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/342/files#r1759324>. >> >> >> -- >> >> >> > > -- > > >

1 0