Mailman 3 January 2014 - pypy-dev

Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy and callbacks
by Dimitri Vorona Jan. 10, 2014

Jan. 10, 2014

@Wim Where could I find the current state of the cling backend implementation? Regards, Dimitri. PS. Please, ignore the email with the wrong subject. > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, <pypy-dev-request(a)python.org> wrote: > >> Send pypy-dev mailing list submissions to >> pypy-dev(a)python.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >> or, via email,… [View More] send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> pypy-dev-request(a)python.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> pypy-dev-owner(a)python.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of pypy-dev digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: cppyy and callbacks (Maciej Fijalkowski) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:13:05 +0200 >> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall(a)gmail.com> >> To: Alex Stewart <foogod(a)gmail.com> >> Cc: PyPy Developer Mailing List <pypy-dev(a)python.org> >> Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] cppyy and callbacks >> Message-ID: >> < >> CAK5idxQMp+phKVsazry6WqeqnoGSWPx5gaGL9wWrPz6fewTGBA(a)mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Alex Stewart <foogod(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'd looked around a bit but could only find vague references to CINT, >> and it >> > wasn't even clear to me whether a full CINT backend really existed or >> it was >> > just a hack/experiment. Is it actually suitable for general-purpose >> use? >> > >> > If so, I'd certainly be happy to try it.. how would one go about >> switching >> > to using the CINT backend instead of Reflex? >> > >> > --Alex >> >> Hey Alex. >> >> On a sidenote - can you please subscribe to pypy-dev so I don't have >> to authorize every single one of your mail? It's relatively painless >> and it's also very low traffic, so you won't get much uninteresting >> stuff. Obviously feel free to unsubscribe once you're done. >> >> Cheers, >> fijal >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pypy-dev mailing list >> pypy-dev(a)python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of pypy-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6 >> *************************************** >> > > [View Less]

2 1

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6
by Dimitri Vorona Jan. 10, 2014

Jan. 10, 2014

@Wim Where could I find the current state of the cling backend implementation? Regards, Dimitri. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:00 PM, <pypy-dev-request(a)python.org> wrote: > Send pypy-dev mailing list submissions to > pypy-dev(a)python.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > pypy-dev-request(a)python.… [View More]

1 0

SSL in the stdlib
by Alex Gaynor Jan. 9, 2014

Jan. 9, 2014

Hey all, There are a number of serious security improvements that have gone into the stdlib SSL module in Python 3. For reasons that defy understanding, the CPython maintainers have decided not to backport them to Python 2. I'd like to backport a few of them, starting with: blocking SSLv2 by default. How do people feel about this? There are basically no servers on the internet that use SSLv2, as it's completely broken, so all this does is prevent an attack. The downside is that there'd be no … [View More]

2 1

Re: [pypy-dev] Haswell System
by Armin Rigo Jan. 4, 2014

Jan. 4, 2014

Hi all, (sent for the pypy-dev mailing list) A quick status update about STM. As I've said on IRC, I am *again* looking at a new approach. This would change the core of STM, but lets us keep most of the work we did on top of it, i.e. inside PyPy and PyPy's JIT. The pre-prototypes (called "c5" and "c6") as well as the current draft (called "c7") tell me that it might work, and it might work very well indeed, with a rather minor overhead. I cannot estimate the percentages yet, but it's … [View More]

1 0