Bugs item #1025372, was opened at 2004-09-09 20:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by potstickr
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1025372&group_…
Category: mail delivery
Group: 2.1 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob Ellis (robellis)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: empty Cc:
Initial Comment:
In lists migrated from 2.0.13, new messages without a
Cc: header
end up with an empty one when delivered by mailman (2.1.5).
Freshly created lists don't seem to have the problem ?
This is on a freebsd 4 stable machine running postfix
2.0.19,1
with mailman set up to use SMTPDirect. Python 2.3.3.
The attached patch to AvoidDuplicates.py/CookHeaders.py
seems to fix it...
- rob
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Morgan Fletcher (potstickr)
Date: 2004-09-15 23:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=459672
I tried this patch on a netbsd machine recently upgraded
from 2.0.8 to 2.1.5. After applying the patch and a 'make
install' I still see the empty Cc header. This bug is
causing some trouble for some our list members, so I was
really hoping this fix would work. Let me know if you need
debugging info or testing of possible patches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1025372&group_…
Bugs item #1028829, was opened at 2004-09-15 23:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1028829&group_…
Category: mail delivery
Group: 2.1 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: tyro (sgasshole)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Memory error????
Initial Comment:
Hiya,
we have a list of approx. 38000 subscribers, here the
result of a post:
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
If you would like to help us identify the problem,
please email a copy of
this page to the webmaster for this site with a
description of what
happened. Thanks!
Traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/mailman/scripts/driver", line 87, in
run_main
main()
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py",
line 248, in main
mlist.Save()
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py", line
525, in Save
self.__save(dict)
File "/usr/local/mailman/Mailman/MailList.py", line
482, in __save
cPickle.dump(dict, fp, 1)
MemoryError
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Python information:
Variable Value
sys.version 2.3.4 (#1, Aug 31 2004, 14:32:37) [GCC
egcs-2.91.66
19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)]
sys.executable /usr/bin/python
sys.prefix /usr/local
sys.exec_prefix /usr/local
sys.path /usr/local
sys.platform linux2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Environment variables:
Variable Value
HTTP_REFERER
http://www.films-festivals.com/mailman/admin/newsletter
SERVER_SOFTWARE Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) ApacheJServ/1.1
PHP/4.0.5
mod_perl/1.25 mod_layout/2.5
SCRIPT_NAME /mailman/admindb
QUERY_STRING
SERVER_SIGNATURE Apache/1.3.11 Server at
www.films-festivals.com Port 80
REQUEST_METHOD GET
PATH_INFO /newsletter
SERVER_PROTOCOL HTTP/1.1
HTTP_EXTENSION Security/Remote-Passphrase
LANG en_US
HTTP_USER_AGENT Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
Windows 98; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)
HTTP_CONNECTION Keep-Alive
HTTP_COOKIE
ffctest+admin=280200000069b0f64741732800000037333062626535303966656266313131
663536326638343064373139386561646262353963323936;
newsletter+admin=2802000000699b374841732800000065363864303630366539356465616
165336437326566393561366261323135653863623465336163
SERVER_NAME www.films-festivals.com
REMOTE_ADDR 81.64.76.173
SYBASE /opt/sybase-11.9.2/
PATH_TRANSLATED /home/ffanet/htdocs/newsletter
SERVER_PORT 80
SERVER_ADDR 62.210.160.22
DOCUMENT_ROOT /home/ffanet/htdocs
PYTHONPATH /usr/local/mailman
SCRIPT_FILENAME /usr/local/mailman/cgi-bin/admindb
SERVER_ADMIN sg(a)a34.net
HTTP_HOST www.films-festivals.com
REQUEST_URI /mailman/admindb/newsletter
HTTP_ACCEPT image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg,
image/pjpeg,
application/vnd.ms-powerpoint,
application/vnd.ms-excel, application/msword,
application/x-shockwave-flash, */*
GATEWAY_INTERFACE CGI/1.1
REMOTE_PORT 3499
HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE fr
REMOTE_HOST m173.net81-64-76.noos.fr
HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING gzip, deflate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1028829&group_…
Patches item #755045, was opened at 2003-06-15 22:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tkikuchi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=755045&group_i…
Category: list administration
Group: Mailman 2.1
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: matze (indygena)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: discard all button for pending posts administration
Initial Comment:
adds a 'discard all' button at the bottom of the pending posts page, usefull for lists with high spam rate.
not sure if this feature is of general interest, people in the projects where we applied this patch feel confortable with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 13:27
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Closing this item because similar feature is included in 2.1.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Zoran Dzelajlija (followme)
Date: 2004-07-05 13:12
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=106281
Could this perhaps be closed as it's quite similar in effect to
810675, which was included in 2.1.5?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Pabs (pabs3)
Date: 2004-01-28 11:15
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=35028
ppl interested in this may also want the default action patch:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=886124&group_id=10…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=755045&group_i…
Patches item #1020102, was opened at 2004-09-01 01:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tkikuchi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1020102&group_…
Category: Web UI
Group: Mailman 2.1
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: fix for spam filter removed (bugid:1013079/1020013)
Initial Comment:
spam rules should be updated only if the subcategory is
'spam'. The patch looks weird but it adds only one 'if'
statement and indent for the if block.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 12:49
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Fixed in CVS Gui/Privacy.py Revision 2.15.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=1020102&group_…
Bugs item #1020013, was opened at 2004-08-31 21:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tkikuchi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1020013&group_…
Category: Web/CGI
Group: 2.1 (stable)
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John Dennis (johndennis)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: spam filters get removed when changing other privacy pages
Initial Comment:
This was filed in the Red Hat bugzilla as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130479
Promoting to upstream
Summary is:
If you enter some header_filter_rules in the mailman
admin pages
(Privacy->Spam filters) and click "submit" they are
added to the
list configuration database.
However, if you now go to one of the other Privacy
pages and click
"submit" and return to the Spam Filters page, you'll
find that your
header_filter_rules settings have been removed.
This appears to be caused by the handleForm function in
~mailman/Mailman/Gui/Privacy.py not checking to see
which subsection
is being submitted before processing the data for and
setting the
mlist.header_filter_rules list configuration variable.
Version-Release number of selected component (if
applicable):
mailman-2.1.5
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create list.
2. Go to the Privacy->Spam filters page, add some
header_filter_rules
and hit submit.
3. Go to the Privacy->Sender filters page but don't hit
submit
4. Go back to Spam filters and note that they're still
present
5. Return to Sender filters and hit submit
6. Go back to Spam filters and note that they've been
removed.
Actual Results: All spam filters are removed.
Expected Results: Spam filter settings should be retained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 12:48
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Fixed in CVS Gui/Privacy.py Revision 2.15.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-01 01:33
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
a patch is uploaded (id 1020102)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1020013&group_…
Bugs item #1013079, was opened at 2004-08-20 19:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tkikuchi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1013079&group_…
Category: security/privacy
Group: 2.1 beta
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ralph Siemsen (ralphs)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: spam filters get removed when changing other privacy pages
Initial Comment:
Error report on behalf of Russell King
(rmk+bugzilla(a)arm.linux.org.uk):
Description of problem:
If you enter some header_filter_rules in the mailman
admin pages (Privacy->Spam filters) and click "submit"
they are added to the list configuration database.
However, if you now go to one of the other Privacy
pages and click "submit" and return to the Spam Filters
page, you'll find that your header_filter_rules
settings have been removed.
This appears to be caused by the handleForm function in
~mailman/Mailman/Gui/Privacy.py not checking to see
which subsection is being submitted before processing
the data for and setting the mlist.header_filter_rules
list configuration variable.
Version-Release number of selected component (if
applicable): mailman-2.1.5-7
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create list.
2. Go to the Privacy->Spam filters page, add some
header_filter_rules and hit submit.
3. Go to the Privacy->Sender filters page but don't hit
submit
4. Go back to Spam filters and note that they're still
present
5. Return to Sender filters and hit submit
6. Go back to Spam filters and note that they've been
removed.
Actual Results: All spam filters are removed.
Expected Results: Spam filter settings should be retained.
Also reported to redhat bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=130479
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 12:46
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Fixed in CVS Gui/Privacy.py Revision 2.15.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-01 01:31
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
a patch was uploaded (id:1020102)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100103&aid=1013079&group_…
Patches item #891491, was opened at 2004-02-06 02:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ber
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=891491&group_i…
Category: Pipermail
Group: Mailman 2.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Scrubber.py patch
Initial Comment:
Scrubber.py has number of bugs for processing various
types of attachment and languages and many have
submitted patches to fix them. This patch item is
opened to collect such patches for convenience.
This patch corrects:
- if an attached text is composed by win notepad, it
has no charset specified and actual charset may be
different from message/list charset. This sometimes
cause error in composing digest message.
- sometimes, null charset is represented by '' as
well as None.
- embedded rfc-2822 message is lost if you don't use
msg.walk()
- special problem with japanese charsets.
- t (stringfied part) may be None which you can't
append a '\n'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bernhard Reiter (ber)
Date: 2004-09-15 10:08
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=113859
Maybe that was because I was using my patches for preventing
to break the signature, too. Those patches keep the charset
lines correct and not reformatted. However that is just a guess.
Thanks for testing and fixing the patch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-14 02:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Your sample email did not reproduce error. Anyway, I managed
to make a message which can cause the error and confirmed
the last fix was valid. Thank you for your cooperation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bernhard Reiter (ber)
Date: 2004-09-13 20:23
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=113859
The patch looks better, but I probably
can only test it when I updated my Mailman patches again.
I have directly send you an email that should trigger the bug
so you can test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-12 01:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Sorry for the problem. I have updated this patch (2004-09-12
version) Please try and report this patch because I can't
fully reproduce the problem (in Japanese environment).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bernhard Reiter (ber)
Date: 2004-09-11 20:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=113859
scrubber.patch 2004-08-24
has a problem.
Charset(lcset).output_charset can return None according
to the documentation. E.g. when no conversion is needed.
This would assign Non to lcset_out .
Later this leads to an exception in
try:
if len(charset) == 0:
charset = 'us-ascii'
t = t.encode(charset, 'replace')
except (UnicodeError, LookupError, ValueError):
t = t.encode(lcset, 'replace')
because:
TypeError: len() of unsized object
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-08-24 09:58
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
added a fix for the case of lcset_out <> lcset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Bernhard Reiter (ber)
Date: 2004-04-14 20:53
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=113859
Thanks for working on the patch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-02-25 11:42
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
uploading revised patch. Now fixes a few more bugs which try
to decode scrub plain text message and result in mojibake.
Also, japanese filename tend to become so long that system
limit may exceeded because of mime encoding, so add an
option not to use the filename in the message but to use
'attachment' as filename. Because this patch spans two files
(Defaults.py.in and Handlers/Scrubber.py) you have to cd
mailman and patch -p1 < this_patch. (Well, I think it is
-p1. If it didn't work, try -p0 ;-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Jonathan Larmour (jifl)
Date: 2004-02-22 18:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=817601
I strongly recommend applying this patch. I received a mail
bounce on a list with an empty charset in a part (i.e.
"charset=") and it caused /var/mailman/cron/senddigest and
thus all digest processing to fail because of this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/mailman/cron/senddigests", line 94, in ?
main()
File "/var/mailman/cron/senddigests", line 86, in main
mlist.send_digest_now()
File "/var/mailman/Mailman/Digester.py", line 60, in
send_digest_now
ToDigest.send_digests(self, mboxfp)
File "/var/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line
123, in send_digests
send_i18n_digests(mlist, mboxfp)
File "/var/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/ToDigest.py", line
295, in send_i18n_digests
msg = scrubber(mlist, msg)
File "/var/mailman/Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py", line
308, in process
t = t.encode(charset, 'replace')
File "/usr/lib/python2.2/encodings/__init__.py", line 51,
in search_function
mod = __import__(modname,globals(),locals(),'*')
which is something this patch fixes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=891491&group_i…
Feature Requests item #1024289, was opened at 2004-09-08 15:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shobhanc
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: yoda (shobhanc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: Add threading support for Lotus Notes < 5.0.9
Initial Comment:
Lotus Notes below 6.25 doesnt set the 'In-Reply-To' or
'References' header. but it sets 'Orig' and 'REF' headers.
Mailman should be able to process 'Orig' and 'REF'
headers if 'In-Reply-To' is not set for Lotus Notes.
Does anyone have any idea how to do this..?
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: yoda (shobhanc)
Date: 2004-09-15 10:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=598275
ok, here are the headers generated by Lotus Notes 5.0.8.
1) The headers of the first mail sent from Lotus Notes:
Return-path: <postmaster(a)lotus-testing.com>
Envelope-to: root(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com
Received: from lotus-testing.com ([11.1.30.111])
by sfeng00.lotussoft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1
(GForge))
id 1C7RyW-0004Zg-00; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:35:00 +0530
Subject: Test mail
To: lotus-thread-mail(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com
Cc: root(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001
Message-ID:
<OFEF923469.E6DCE47F-ON65256F10.001BCB3D(a)lotus-testing.com>
From: postmaster(a)lotus-testing.com
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:33:51 +0530
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on
lotus-testing/LOTUSTesting(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at
09/15/2004 10:33:51 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is the test mail
2) The reply headers for the original mail from Lotus Notes:
Return-path: <postmaster(a)lotus-testing.com>
Envelope-to: root(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com
Received: from lotus-testing.com ([11.1.30.111])
by sfeng00.lotussoft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1
(GForge))
id 1C7S3q-0004an-00; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:40:30 +0530
Subject: Re: [Lotus-thread-mail] Test mail
To: postmaster(a)lotus-testing.com
Cc: lotus-thread-mail(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com,
lotus-thread-mail-admin(a)sfeng00.lotussoft.com,
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001
Message-ID:
<OF624C3EA6.6775904D-ON65256F10.001C4DFB(a)lotus-testing.com>
From: postmaster(a)lotus-testing.com
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:39:21 +0530
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on
lotus-testing/LOTUSTesting(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at
09/15/2004 10:39:21 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply to the test mail.
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 07:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Sorry but I have no Notes users around. So, this is low
priority. I suggest you upload relevant message header
example in case some one is interested.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: yoda (shobhanc)
Date: 2004-09-14 19:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=598275
Thanks tkikuchi,
Any idea whats the alternative to thread the mails if $REF
header is not set in the reply mail from Lotus Notes, like
an autogenerated number be added to the subject line and
check the number in the reply mail and generate a thread
likewise..??
Thanks for your time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-14 18:06
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
No patch. Requesting a feature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…
Feature Requests item #1024289, was opened at 2004-09-08 10:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tkikuchi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: yoda (shobhanc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Add support for $Orig and $REF for Lotus Notes < 5.0.9
Initial Comment:
Lotus Notes below 6.25 doesnt set the 'In-Reply-To' or
'References' header. but it sets 'Orig' and 'REF' headers.
Mailman should be able to process 'Orig' and 'REF'
headers if 'In-Reply-To' is not set for Lotus Notes.
Does anyone have any idea how to do this..?
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-15 02:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
Sorry but I have no Notes users around. So, this is low
priority. I suggest you upload relevant message header
example in case some one is interested.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: yoda (shobhanc)
Date: 2004-09-14 14:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=598275
Thanks tkikuchi,
Any idea whats the alternative to thread the mails if $REF
header is not set in the reply mail from Lotus Notes, like
an autogenerated number be added to the subject line and
check the number in the reply mail and generate a thread
likewise..??
Thanks for your time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-14 13:06
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
No patch. Requesting a feature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…
Feature Requests item #1024289, was opened at 2004-09-08 15:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by shobhanc
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: yoda (shobhanc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Add support for $Orig and $REF for Lotus Notes < 5.0.9
Initial Comment:
Lotus Notes below 6.25 doesnt set the 'In-Reply-To' or
'References' header. but it sets 'Orig' and 'REF' headers.
Mailman should be able to process 'Orig' and 'REF'
headers if 'In-Reply-To' is not set for Lotus Notes.
Does anyone have any idea how to do this..?
Thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: yoda (shobhanc)
Date: 2004-09-14 19:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=598275
Thanks tkikuchi,
Any idea whats the alternative to thread the mails if $REF
header is not set in the reply mail from Lotus Notes, like
an autogenerated number be added to the subject line and
check the number in the reply mail and generate a thread
likewise..??
Thanks for your time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Tokio Kikuchi (tkikuchi)
Date: 2004-09-14 18:06
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=67709
No patch. Requesting a feature.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350103&aid=1024289&group_…