Mailman 3 December 2009 - Mailman-coders

[ mailman-Patches-657951 ] Generate RSS summary in archives
by SourceForge.net 19 Aug '22

19 Aug '22

Patches item #657951, was opened at 2002-12-23 14:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Generate RSS summary in archives Initial Comment: Here's a first-draft patch. Things that need fixing: * The generated RSS feed needs to be validated. (It passed the W3C's RDF validator, but RSS validators still need to be checked.) * The date should be given in YYYY-MM-DD format, which requires parsing the .fromdate attribute. * How do I get the URL for an archived message? The generated RSS currently just uses the filename, which is wrong. How do I get at the PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL setting? * Getting the most recent N postings is inefficient; the code loops through all of the archived messages and takes the last N of them. We could add .last() and .prev() methods to the Database class, but that's more ambitious for 2.1beta than I like. (Would be nice to get this into 2.1final...) * The list index page should have a LINK element pointing to the RSS file. Please make any comments you have, and I'll rework the patch accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-04-18 18:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Andrew, to get the url for the archived message use mlist.GetBaseArchiveURL(), which knows about private vs. public archives, the host name and the list name. From there you should be able to tack on just the part of the path under "archives/private/listname". See Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py for an example. Only other minor comment: NUM_ARTICLES can probably go in Defaults.py.in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Justin Mason (jmason) Date: 2003-03-26 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935 big thumbs up from me too. Much better solution than http://taint.org/mmrss/ ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Uche Ogbuji (uche) Date: 2003-03-17 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=38966 I'd like to add my vote to this item. This is a fantastic idea, Andrew. Thanks. --Uche ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Updated patch: * Dates are now rendered as ISO-8601 (date only, not the time of the message) * By hard-wiring 2002-December, I got the RSS to validate using Mark Pilgrim's validator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: captain larry (captainlarry) Date: 2002-12-23 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=147905 Just voting for support here. This is *great* thanks for the patch and I hope the maintainers include it as soon as it's appropriate :) Adam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-23 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Deferring until post-2.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Argh; SF choked on the file upload. Attaching the patch again... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i…

2 1

[Bug 500955] [NEW] Templates for AST use inconsistent DOCTYPE
by Matt Selsky 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Public bug reported: Most of the templates use a DOCTYPE of HTML 4.01 Transitional, but the AST templates use HTML 3.2. The patch updates the DOCTYPES for the AST templates. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Templates for AST use inconsistent DOCTYPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 3

[Bug 500952] [NEW] Extra escape characters in DOCTYPE
by Matt Selsky 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Public bug reported: The DOCTYPE header for 2 files in the sk templates contain extra escape characters around the quote marks. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Extra escape characters in DOCTYPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 3

[Bug 501739] [NEW] Approved: header not always removed
by Mark Sapiro 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Public bug reported: Approve follows SpamDetect in the default pipeline. If SpamDetect or another custom or reordered handler preceding Approve holds a post containing an Approve(d): header or pseudo-header, and that post is approved, the Approve(d): header or pseudo-header will not be removed from the delivered message. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Approved: header not always removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 2

[Bug 497968] [NEW] Need a 'no-daemonize' option for '/bin/mailman start'
by Steve Burling 20 Jun '10

20 Jun '10

Public bug reported: The version of Mailman distributed with Apple's Mac OS X Server has a hacked up mailmanctl, primarily to support not daemonizing in the launchd environment. (I think). Their hack is ugly, and it'd be nice if it was made unnecessary. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Need a 'no-daemonize' option for '/bin/mailman start' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497968 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 5

[Bug 265613] Re: Script Error in check_perms
by Mark Sapiro 31 Dec '09

31 Dec '09

** Changed in: mailman Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: mailman Milestone: 2.0.x => 2.1-stable -- Script Error in check_perms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 0

[Bug 265613] Re: Script Error in check_perms
by Mark Sapiro 31 Dec '09

31 Dec '09

This bug still is relevant to current Mailman. It occurs whenever the lists/ directory contains a file as opposed to just directories. ** Changed in: mailman Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Changed in: mailman Assignee: (unassigned) => Mark Sapiro (msapiro) -- Script Error in check_perms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 0

[Bug 490602] [NEW] sourcecode/mailman/configure.in does not support group names with spaces
by Launchpad Bug Tracker 30 Dec '09

30 Dec '09

You have been subscribed to a public bug: conftest.py created in sourcecode/mailman/configure.in gets passed a partial group name when the group name has a space, such as "domain users". It appears to be passed at line 382 where it is assigned to mailmangroup and that MM_FIND_GROUP_NAME takes a list of space separated groups. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- sourcecode/mailman/configure.in does not support group names with spaces https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/490602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 0

[Bug 490602] Re: sourcecode/mailman/configure.in does not support group names with spaces
by Curtis Hovey 30 Dec '09

30 Dec '09

** Project changed: launchpad => mailman ** Changed in: mailman Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: mailman Importance: Undecided => Low -- sourcecode/mailman/configure.in does not support group names with spaces https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is a direct subscriber.

1 0

[Bug 500695] [NEW] Some sendmail bounces not detected
by Matt Selsky 29 Dec '09

29 Dec '09

Public bug reported: Some bounces from sendmail are not detected by the current bounce code. A regression was introduced in svn commit r4486: http://mailman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mailman/trunk/mailman/Mailman/Bou… When ?P<addr> was changed to ?P<fulladdr>, the code in the process() function was not updated to match. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Some sendmail bounces not detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 8

Mailman-coders December 2009