Mailman 3 August 2000 - Distutils-SIG

Sample setup.py for Numeric Python
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi again -- [cc'd to Paul Dubois: you said you weren't following the distutils sig anymore, but this directly concerns NumPy and I'd like to get your input!] here's that sample setup.py for NumPy. See below for discussion (and questions!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/bin/env python # Setup script example for building the Numeric extension to Python. # This does sucessfully compile all the .dlls. Nothing happens # with the .py files currently. # Move this file to the Numerical directory of the LLNL numpy # distribution and run as: # python numpysetup.py --verbose build_ext # # created 1999/08 Perry Stoll __rcsid__ = "$Id: numpysetup.py,v 1.1 1999/09/12 20:42:48 gward Exp $" from distutils.core import setup setup (name = "numerical", version = "0.01", description = "Numerical Extension to Python", url = "http://www.python.org/sigs/matrix-sig/", ext_modules = [ ( '_numpy', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/_numpymodule.c', 'Src/arrayobject.c', 'Src/ufuncobject.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/numpy.def' } ), ( 'multiarray', { 'sources' : ['Src/multiarraymodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file': 'Src/multiarray.def' } ), ( 'umath', { 'sources': ['Src/umathmodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/umath.def' } ), ( 'fftpack', { 'sources': ['Src/fftpackmodule.c', 'Src/fftpack.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/fftpack.def' } ), ( 'lapack_lite', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/lapack_litemodule.c', 'Src/dlapack_lite.c', 'Src/zlapack_lite.c', 'Src/blas_lite.c', 'Src/f2c_lite.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/lapack_lite.def' } ), ( 'ranlib', { 'sources': ['Src/ranlibmodule.c', 'Src/ranlib.c', 'Src/com.c', 'Src/linpack.c', ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/ranlib.def' } ), ] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First, what d'you think? Too clunky and verbose? Too much information for each extension? I kind of think so, but I'm not sure how to reduce it elegantly. Right now, the internal data structures needed to compile a module are pretty obviously exposed: is this a good thing? Or should there be some more compact form for setup.py that will be expanded later into the full glory we see above? I've already made one small step towards reducing the amount of cruft by factoring 'include_dirs' out and supplying it directly as a parameter to 'setup()'. (But that needs code not in the CVS archive yet, so I've left the sample setup.py the same for now.) The next thing I'd like to do is get that damn "def_file" out of there. To support it in MSVCCompiler, there's already an ugly hack that unnecessarily affects both the UnixCCompiler and CCompiler classes, and I want to get rid of that. (I refer to passing the 'build_info' dictionary into the compiler classes, if you're familiar with the code -- that dictionary is part of the Distutils extension-building system, and should not propagate into the more general compiler classes.) But I don't want to give these weird "def file" things standing on the order of source files, object files, libraries, etc., because they seem to me to be a bizarre artifact of one particular compiler, rather than something present in a wide range of C/C++ compilers. Based on the NumPy model, it seems like there's a not-too-kludgy way to handle this problem. Namely: if building extension "foo": if file "foo.def" found in same directory as "foo.c" add "/def:foo.def" to MSVC command line this will of course require some platform-specific code in the build_ext command class, but I figured that was coming eventually, so why put it off? ;-) To make this hack work with NumPy, one change would be necessary: rename Src/numpy.def to Src/_numpy.def to match Src/_numpy.c, which implements the _numpy module. Would this be too much to ask of NumPy? (Paul?) What about other module distributions that support MSVC++ and thus ship with "def" files? Could they be made to accomodate this scheme? Thanks for your feedback -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

4 5

Can now compile simple extensions
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all -- at long last, I found the time to hack in the ability to compile extension modules to the Distutils. Mainly, this meant adding a 'build_ext' command which uses a CCompiler instance for all its dirty work. I also had to add a few methods to CCompiler (and, of course, UnixCCompiler) to make this work. And I added a new module, 'spawn', which takes care of running sub-programs more efficiently and robustly (no shell involved) than os.system. That's needed, obviously, so we can run the compiler! If you're in the mood for grubbing over raw source code, then get the latest from CVS or download a current snapshot. See http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/implementation.html for a link to the code snapshot. I'm still waiting for more subclasses of CCompiler to appear. At the very least, we're going to need MSVCCompiler to build extensions on Windows. Any takers? Also, someone who knows the Mac, and how to run compilers programmatically there, will have to figure out how to write a Mac-specific concrete CCompiler subclass. The spawn module also needs a bit of work to be portable. I suspect that _win32_spawn() (the intended analog to my _posix_spawn()) will be easy to implement, if it even needs to go in a separate function at all. It looks from the Python Library documentation for 1.5.2 that the os.spawnv() function is all we need, but it's a bit hard to figure out just what's needed. Windows wizards, please take a look at the 'spawn()' function and see if you can make it work on Windows. As for actually compiling extensions: well, if you can figure out the build_ext command, go ahead and give it a whirl. It's a bit cryptic right now, since there's no documentation and no example setup.py. (I have a working example at home, but it's not available online.) If you feel up to it, though, see if you can read the code and figure out what's going on. I'm just hoping *I'll* be able to figure out what's going on when I get back from the O'Reilly conference next week... ;-) Enjoy -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Two fixes (at last)
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all -- at long last, I have fixed two problems that a couple people noticed a while ago: * I folded in Amos Latteier's NT patches almost verbatim -- just changed an `os.path.sep == "/"' to `os.name == "posix"' and added some comments bitching about the inadequacy of the current library installation model (I think this is Python's fault, but for now Distutils is slavishly aping the situation in Python 1.5.x) * I fixed the problem whereby running "setup.py install" without doing anything else caused a crash (because 'build' hadn't yet been run). Now, the 'install' command automatically runs 'build' before doing anything; to make this bearable, I added a 'have_run' dictionary to the Distribution class to keep track of which commands have been run. So now not only are command classes singletons, but their 'run' method can only be invoked once -- both restrictions enforced by Distribution. The code is checked into CVS, or you can download a snapshot at http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/distutils-19990607.tar.gz Hope someone (Amos?) can try the new version under NT. Any takers for Mac OS? BTW, all parties involved in the Great "Where Do We Install Stuff?" Debate should take a good, hard look at the 'set_final_options()' method of the Install class in distutils/install.py; this is where all the policy decisions about where to install files are made. Currently it apes the Python 1.5 situation as closely as I could figure it out. Obviously, this is subject to change -- I just don't know to *what* it will change! Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Package versioning
by Timothy Docker 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all, I've been aware that the distutils sig has been simmerring away, but until recently it has not been directly relevant to what I do. I like the look of the proposed api, but have one question. Will this support an installed system that has multiple versions of the same package installed simultaneously? If not, then this would seem to be a significant limitation, especially when dependencies between packages are considered. Assuming it does, then how will this be achieved? I am presently managing this with a messy arrangement of symlinks. A package is installed with its version number in it's name, and a separate directory is created for an application with links from the unversioned package name to the versioned one. Then I just set the pythonpath to this directory. A sample of what the directory looks like is shown below. I'm sure there is a better solution that this, and I'm not sure that this would work under windows anyway (does windows have symlinks?). So, has this SIG considered such versioning issues yet? Cheers, Tim -------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Docker timd(a)macquarie.com.au Quantative Applications Division Macquarie Bank -------------------------------------------------------------- qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/ total 110 drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:23 1.1 -r--r----- 1 root mts 45172 Sep 1 1998 cdrmodule_0_7_1.so drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 chart_1_1 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Fnorb_0_7_1 dr-xr-x--- 3 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 Fnorb_0_8 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 1536 Mar 3 12:45 mts_1_1 dr-xr-x--- 7 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:22 OpenGL_1_5_1 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 1024 Nov 11 11:23 PIL_0_3 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Pmw_0_7 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 v3d_1_1 qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/1.1 total 30 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Apr 10 10:43 _glumodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glumodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 30 Apr 10 10:43 _glutmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glutmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 22 Apr 10 10:43 _imaging.so -> ../PIL_0_3/_imaging.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 36 Apr 10 10:43 _opengl_nummodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_opengl_nummodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 27 Apr 10 10:43 _tkinter.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_tkinter.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 21 Apr 10 10:43 cdrmodule.so -> ../cdrmodule_0_7_1.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 chart -> ../chart_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 12 Apr 10 10:43 Fnorb -> ../Fnorb_0_8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 mts -> ../mts_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Apr 10 10:43 OpenGL -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 opengltrmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/opengltrmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 openglutil_num.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/openglutil_num.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 PIL -> ../PIL_0_3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 10 Apr 10 10:43 Pmw -> ../Pmw_0_7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 v3d -> ../v3d_1_1

3 2

[Distutils-sig] distutils charter and interscript
by John Skaller 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

3 2

some small bugs
by Rene Liebscher 04 Sep '00

04 Sep '00

While playing with distutils, I found some (old) bugs. If your distribution directory for bdist doesn't exist, distutils doesn't create it. (Even the default 'dist', so distutils fails if you use bdist for the first time.) bdist_wininst fails if no long description exists. It should warn about this, and go ahead. And a new introduced one in bcppcompiler.py It uses the first object file's path name to get the directory for its def-file. But if there is another object placed at the first position, this doesn't work. The patch moves these parts to their right position. The patch also changes the prefered library names from bcpp_xxx.lib to xxx_bcpp.lib. The next is not a bug. I tried distutils with BeOS R5. BeOS uses also some linker scripts (as AIX does.) But in the Makefile are again the wrong pathnames to these scripts. So we have to correct this as for AIX in sysconfig.py. (Python doesn't install these scripts, I will put a patch for its Makefile.in to sourceforge.) And finally some corrections to the comments in my cygwinccompiler class. Kind regards Rene Liebscher diff -BurN --minimal --exclude=*.pyc distutils.orig/distutils/bcppcompiler.py distutils.patched/distutils/bcppcompiler.py --- distutils.orig/distutils/bcppcompiler.py Mon Aug 14 15:13:04 2000 +++ distutils.patched/distutils/bcppcompiler.py Thu Aug 17 12:58:03 2000 @@ -224,17 +224,6 @@ else: ld_args = self.ldflags_shared[:] - # Borland C++ has problems with '/' in paths - objects = map(os.path.normpath, objects) - startup_obj = 'c0d32' - objects.insert(0, startup_obj) - - # either exchange python15.lib in the python libs directory against - # a Borland-like one, or create one with name bcpp_python15.lib - # there and remove the pragmas from config.h - libraries.append ('import32') - libraries.append ('cw32mt') - # Create a temporary exports file for use by the linker head, tail = os.path.split (output_filename) modname, ext = os.path.splitext (tail) @@ -246,6 +235,17 @@ self.execute(write_file, (def_file, contents), "writing %s" % def_file) + # Borland C++ has problems with '/' in paths + objects = map(os.path.normpath, objects) + startup_obj = 'c0d32' + objects.insert(0, startup_obj) + + # either exchange python15.lib in the python libs directory against + # a Borland-like one, or create one with name bcpp_python15.lib + # there and remove the pragmas from config.h + libraries.append ('import32') + libraries.append ('cw32mt') + # Start building command line flags and options. for l in library_dirs: @@ -377,9 +377,9 @@ # seems to have a different format for static libraries. if debug: dlib = (lib + "_d") - try_names = ("bcpp_" + dlib, "bcpp_" + lib, dlib, lib) + try_names = (dlib + "_bcpp", lib + "_bcpp", dlib, lib) else: - try_names = ("bcpp_" + lib, lib) + try_names = (lib + "_bcpp", lib) for dir in dirs: for name in try_names: diff -BurN --minimal --exclude=*.pyc distutils.orig/distutils/command/bdist.py distutils.patched/distutils/command/bdist.py --- distutils.orig/distutils/command/bdist.py Thu Aug 3 11:00:00 2000 +++ distutils.patched/distutils/command/bdist.py Thu Aug 17 13:14:58 2000 @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ def run (self): + # create dist directory + self.mkpath(self.dist_dir) + for format in self.formats: try: cmd_name = self.format_command[format][0] diff -BurN --minimal --exclude=*.pyc distutils.orig/distutils/command/bdist_wininst.py distutils.patched/distutils/command/bdist_wininst.py --- distutils.orig/distutils/command/bdist_wininst.py Tue Aug 8 13:18:38 2000 +++ distutils.patched/distutils/command/bdist_wininst.py Thu Aug 17 13:08:20 2000 @@ -137,8 +137,12 @@ # 'info' will be displayed in the installer's dialog box, # describing the items to be installed. - info = metadata.long_description + '\n' - + if metadata.long_description: + info = metadata.long_description + '\n' + else: + self.warn ('no long_description available') + info = '' + for name in dir (metadata): if (name != 'long_description'): data = getattr (metadata, name) diff -BurN --minimal --exclude=*.pyc distutils.orig/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py distutils.patched/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py --- distutils.orig/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py Mon Aug 14 15:13:04 2000 +++ distutils.patched/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py Thu Aug 17 12:59:50 2000 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ # # see also http://starship.python.net/crew/kernr/mingw32/Notes.html # -# * We use put export_symbols in a def-file, and don't use +# * We put export_symbols in a def-file, and don't use # --export-all-symbols because it doesn't worked reliable in some # tested configurations. And because other windows compilers also # need their symbols specified this no serious problem. @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ # (ld doesn't support -shared, so we use dllwrap) # * cygwin gcc 2.95.2/ld 2.10.90/dllwrap 2.10.90 works now # - its dllwrap doesn't work, there is a bug in binutils 2.10.90 -# see also ..... +# see also http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-06/msg01274.html # - using gcc -mdll instead dllwrap doesn't work without -static because # it tries to link against dlls instead their import libraries. (If # it finds the dll first.) diff -BurN --minimal --exclude=*.pyc distutils.orig/distutils/sysconfig.py distutils.patched/distutils/sysconfig.py --- distutils.orig/distutils/sysconfig.py Thu Aug 3 11:00:00 2000 +++ distutils.patched/distutils/sysconfig.py Thu Aug 17 13:05:20 2000 @@ -254,6 +254,15 @@ python_exp = os.path.join(python_lib, 'config', 'python.exp') g['LDSHARED'] = "%s %s -bI:%s" % (ld_so_aix, g['CC'], python_exp) + if sys.platform == 'beos': + # Linker script is in the BeOS directory instead the config + # directory. In the Makefile it is relative to the srcdir which after + # installation no longer makes sense + python_lib = get_python_lib(standard_lib=1) + linkerscript_name = os.path.basename(string.split(g['LDSHARED'],' ')[0]) + linkerscript = os.path.join(python_lib, 'BeOS', linkerscript_name) + g['LDSHARED'] = ("%s -L%s/lib -lpython%s" + % (linkerscript,sys.prefix,sys.version[0:3])) def _init_nt():

5 11

About version discussion
by Harry Henry Gebel 02 Sep '00

02 Sep '00

I was wondering if it might be a good idea to put a function in Distutils that could query if the currently installed version has certain abilities. Each ability could be assigned a name, and it could be implemented very simply: (in setup.py) try: if not check_ability('a'): raise Exception # to be caught and reraised as SystemExit except: # for versions of Distutils without check_ability(), or without 'a' raise SystemExit, 'This package requires a more recent version of Distutils' (somewhere in the Distutils) def check_ability(ability): ''' Return true if ability is supported by Distutils ''' return ability in ['a', 'b', 'c'] -- Harry Henry Gebel, Senior Developer, Landon House SBS ICQ# 76308382 West Dover Hundred, Delaware

2 3

ANNOUNCE: Distutils 0.9.2
by Greg Ward 31 Aug '00

31 Aug '00

...just in time for the Python 2.0b1 feature freeze, Distutils 0.9.2 has been released. Changes since 0.9.1: * fixed bug that broke extension-building under Windows for older setup scripts (not using the new Extension class) * new version of bdist_wininst command and associated tools: fixes some bugs, produces a smaller exeuctable, and has a nicer GUI (thanks to Thomas Heller) * added some hooks to 'setup()' to allow some slightly sneaky ways into the Distutils, in addition to the standard "run 'setup()' from a setup script" Get your copy today: http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/download.html Greg

1 0

Numeric-16.0 problem
by Robin Becker 31 Aug '00

31 Aug '00

I guess this error is caused by Numeric-16.0 taking the distutils version string list a bit too seriously. The setup.py script wants to do if vs[0] < 1 and vs[1] < 9: raise SystemExit, "Please see README: Distutils-0.9 or later required." is there a correct way to get this kind of version number? C:\Python\devel\Numeric-16.0>python setup.py build Traceback (innermost last): File "setup.py", line 14, in ? vs = map(string.atoi, string.split(v, '.')) File "<built-in>", line 2, in map ValueError: invalid literal for atoi(): 2pre -- Robin Becker

6 9

Re: [Bug #113106] distutils' msvccompiler.py has small C++ defects
by Greg Ward 30 Aug '00

30 Aug '00

On 30 August 2000, Alex Martelli said: > from a brief experiment, the /GX switch seems to be OK with > C sources too (probably no effect?). For prudence, however, > my approach had been to add it only when compiling C++ > sources -- that's easy too given the way the loop is set up > now (there's already an if/else to set the /Tp or /TP switch > for the sourcecode; I just added another variable, to be > concatenated at the end, set to either [] or ['/GX']). That's > probably more prudence than actually needed here, I guess. I'm checking in the easy-cheezy approach: use /GX when compiling anything. If it doesn't work for C code, we'll find out soon enough. Prudence, shmudence... Greg

1 0