Mailman 3 September 2000 - Distutils-SIG

Sample setup.py for Numeric Python
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi again -- [cc'd to Paul Dubois: you said you weren't following the distutils sig anymore, but this directly concerns NumPy and I'd like to get your input!] here's that sample setup.py for NumPy. See below for discussion (and questions!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/bin/env python # Setup script example for building the Numeric extension to Python. # This does sucessfully compile all the .dlls. Nothing happens # with the .py files currently. # Move this file to the Numerical directory of the LLNL numpy # distribution and run as: # python numpysetup.py --verbose build_ext # # created 1999/08 Perry Stoll __rcsid__ = "$Id: numpysetup.py,v 1.1 1999/09/12 20:42:48 gward Exp $" from distutils.core import setup setup (name = "numerical", version = "0.01", description = "Numerical Extension to Python", url = "http://www.python.org/sigs/matrix-sig/", ext_modules = [ ( '_numpy', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/_numpymodule.c', 'Src/arrayobject.c', 'Src/ufuncobject.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/numpy.def' } ), ( 'multiarray', { 'sources' : ['Src/multiarraymodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file': 'Src/multiarray.def' } ), ( 'umath', { 'sources': ['Src/umathmodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/umath.def' } ), ( 'fftpack', { 'sources': ['Src/fftpackmodule.c', 'Src/fftpack.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/fftpack.def' } ), ( 'lapack_lite', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/lapack_litemodule.c', 'Src/dlapack_lite.c', 'Src/zlapack_lite.c', 'Src/blas_lite.c', 'Src/f2c_lite.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/lapack_lite.def' } ), ( 'ranlib', { 'sources': ['Src/ranlibmodule.c', 'Src/ranlib.c', 'Src/com.c', 'Src/linpack.c', ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/ranlib.def' } ), ] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First, what d'you think? Too clunky and verbose? Too much information for each extension? I kind of think so, but I'm not sure how to reduce it elegantly. Right now, the internal data structures needed to compile a module are pretty obviously exposed: is this a good thing? Or should there be some more compact form for setup.py that will be expanded later into the full glory we see above? I've already made one small step towards reducing the amount of cruft by factoring 'include_dirs' out and supplying it directly as a parameter to 'setup()'. (But that needs code not in the CVS archive yet, so I've left the sample setup.py the same for now.) The next thing I'd like to do is get that damn "def_file" out of there. To support it in MSVCCompiler, there's already an ugly hack that unnecessarily affects both the UnixCCompiler and CCompiler classes, and I want to get rid of that. (I refer to passing the 'build_info' dictionary into the compiler classes, if you're familiar with the code -- that dictionary is part of the Distutils extension-building system, and should not propagate into the more general compiler classes.) But I don't want to give these weird "def file" things standing on the order of source files, object files, libraries, etc., because they seem to me to be a bizarre artifact of one particular compiler, rather than something present in a wide range of C/C++ compilers. Based on the NumPy model, it seems like there's a not-too-kludgy way to handle this problem. Namely: if building extension "foo": if file "foo.def" found in same directory as "foo.c" add "/def:foo.def" to MSVC command line this will of course require some platform-specific code in the build_ext command class, but I figured that was coming eventually, so why put it off? ;-) To make this hack work with NumPy, one change would be necessary: rename Src/numpy.def to Src/_numpy.def to match Src/_numpy.c, which implements the _numpy module. Would this be too much to ask of NumPy? (Paul?) What about other module distributions that support MSVC++ and thus ship with "def" files? Could they be made to accomodate this scheme? Thanks for your feedback -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

4 5

Can now compile simple extensions
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all -- at long last, I found the time to hack in the ability to compile extension modules to the Distutils. Mainly, this meant adding a 'build_ext' command which uses a CCompiler instance for all its dirty work. I also had to add a few methods to CCompiler (and, of course, UnixCCompiler) to make this work. And I added a new module, 'spawn', which takes care of running sub-programs more efficiently and robustly (no shell involved) than os.system. That's needed, obviously, so we can run the compiler! If you're in the mood for grubbing over raw source code, then get the latest from CVS or download a current snapshot. See http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/implementation.html for a link to the code snapshot. I'm still waiting for more subclasses of CCompiler to appear. At the very least, we're going to need MSVCCompiler to build extensions on Windows. Any takers? Also, someone who knows the Mac, and how to run compilers programmatically there, will have to figure out how to write a Mac-specific concrete CCompiler subclass. The spawn module also needs a bit of work to be portable. I suspect that _win32_spawn() (the intended analog to my _posix_spawn()) will be easy to implement, if it even needs to go in a separate function at all. It looks from the Python Library documentation for 1.5.2 that the os.spawnv() function is all we need, but it's a bit hard to figure out just what's needed. Windows wizards, please take a look at the 'spawn()' function and see if you can make it work on Windows. As for actually compiling extensions: well, if you can figure out the build_ext command, go ahead and give it a whirl. It's a bit cryptic right now, since there's no documentation and no example setup.py. (I have a working example at home, but it's not available online.) If you feel up to it, though, see if you can read the code and figure out what's going on. I'm just hoping *I'll* be able to figure out what's going on when I get back from the O'Reilly conference next week... ;-) Enjoy -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Two fixes (at last)
by Greg Ward 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all -- at long last, I have fixed two problems that a couple people noticed a while ago: * I folded in Amos Latteier's NT patches almost verbatim -- just changed an `os.path.sep == "/"' to `os.name == "posix"' and added some comments bitching about the inadequacy of the current library installation model (I think this is Python's fault, but for now Distutils is slavishly aping the situation in Python 1.5.x) * I fixed the problem whereby running "setup.py install" without doing anything else caused a crash (because 'build' hadn't yet been run). Now, the 'install' command automatically runs 'build' before doing anything; to make this bearable, I added a 'have_run' dictionary to the Distribution class to keep track of which commands have been run. So now not only are command classes singletons, but their 'run' method can only be invoked once -- both restrictions enforced by Distribution. The code is checked into CVS, or you can download a snapshot at http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/distutils-19990607.tar.gz Hope someone (Amos?) can try the new version under NT. Any takers for Mac OS? BTW, all parties involved in the Great "Where Do We Install Stuff?" Debate should take a good, hard look at the 'set_final_options()' method of the Install class in distutils/install.py; this is where all the policy decisions about where to install files are made. Currently it apes the Python 1.5 situation as closely as I could figure it out. Obviously, this is subject to change -- I just don't know to *what* it will change! Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Package versioning
by Timothy Docker 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

Hi all, I've been aware that the distutils sig has been simmerring away, but until recently it has not been directly relevant to what I do. I like the look of the proposed api, but have one question. Will this support an installed system that has multiple versions of the same package installed simultaneously? If not, then this would seem to be a significant limitation, especially when dependencies between packages are considered. Assuming it does, then how will this be achieved? I am presently managing this with a messy arrangement of symlinks. A package is installed with its version number in it's name, and a separate directory is created for an application with links from the unversioned package name to the versioned one. Then I just set the pythonpath to this directory. A sample of what the directory looks like is shown below. I'm sure there is a better solution that this, and I'm not sure that this would work under windows anyway (does windows have symlinks?). So, has this SIG considered such versioning issues yet? Cheers, Tim -------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Docker timd(a)macquarie.com.au Quantative Applications Division Macquarie Bank -------------------------------------------------------------- qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/ total 110 drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:23 1.1 -r--r----- 1 root mts 45172 Sep 1 1998 cdrmodule_0_7_1.so drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 chart_1_1 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Fnorb_0_7_1 dr-xr-x--- 3 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 Fnorb_0_8 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 1536 Mar 3 12:45 mts_1_1 dr-xr-x--- 7 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:22 OpenGL_1_5_1 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 1024 Nov 11 11:23 PIL_0_3 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Pmw_0_7 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 v3d_1_1 qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/1.1 total 30 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Apr 10 10:43 _glumodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glumodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 30 Apr 10 10:43 _glutmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glutmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 22 Apr 10 10:43 _imaging.so -> ../PIL_0_3/_imaging.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 36 Apr 10 10:43 _opengl_nummodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_opengl_nummodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 27 Apr 10 10:43 _tkinter.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_tkinter.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 21 Apr 10 10:43 cdrmodule.so -> ../cdrmodule_0_7_1.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 chart -> ../chart_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 12 Apr 10 10:43 Fnorb -> ../Fnorb_0_8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 mts -> ../mts_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Apr 10 10:43 OpenGL -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 opengltrmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/opengltrmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 openglutil_num.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/openglutil_num.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 PIL -> ../PIL_0_3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 10 Apr 10 10:43 Pmw -> ../Pmw_0_7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 v3d -> ../v3d_1_1

3 2

[Distutils-sig] distutils charter and interscript
by John Skaller 29 Apr '18

29 Apr '18

3 2

Distutils 1.0 code freeze: Oct 1
by Greg Ward 03 Oct '00

03 Oct '00

Considering the following schedule of events: Oct 4: I go out of town (away from email, off the net, etc.) Oct 10: planned release of Python 2.0 Oct 12: I'm back in town, ready to hack! (and wondering why it's so quiet around here...) the Distutils 1.0 release will go out October 1 or 2. I don't need quite as much code freeze time as the full Python release, but let's put it this way: if there are features you want added to the Distutils that I don't already know about, forget about it. Changes currently under consideration: * Rene Liebscher's rearrangement of the CCompiler classes; most of this is just reducing the amount of code, but it does add some minor features, so it's under consideration. * making byte-compilation more flexible: should be able to generate both .pyc and .pyo files, and should be able to do it at build time or install time (developer's and packager's discretion) If you know about any outstanding Distutils bugs, please tell me *now*. Put 'em in the SourceForge bug database if you're wondering why I haven't fixed them yet -- they might have gotten lost, I might not know about 'em, etc. If you're not sure, put it in SourceForge. Stuff that will definitely have to wait until after 1.0: * a "test" command (standard test framework for Python modules) * finishing the "config" command (auto-configuration) * installing package meta-data, to support "what *do* I have installed, anyways?" queries, uninstallation, upgrades, etc. Blue-sky projects: * standard documentation processing * intra-module dependencies Greg -- Greg Ward gward(a)python.net http://starship.python.net/~gward/

3 4

Byte-compilation revisited
by Greg Ward 03 Oct '00

03 Oct '00

Hi all -- based on and inspired by recent patches from Marc-Andre Lemburg and Rene Liebscher, I've finally started tackling the byte-compilation problem in earnest. Here's the approach I'm taking: * new function 'byte_compile()' in distutils.util: this is the all- singing, all-dancing wrapper around py_compile that will do all the real work * reduce the 'bytecompile()' method in the install_lib command to a simple wrapper around 'util.byte_compile()', that does the Right Thing with respect to optimization and claimed source filename written to the .py{c,o} file * add similar functionality to the build_py command, so that you may optionally do byte-compilation at build time rather than install time. The first two steps are done and checked in, except that install_lib's 'bytecompile()' method doesn't yet take advantage of the fancy features in the new 'byte_compile()' -- it doesn't rewrite filenames or do optimization. The default will continue to be doing compilation at install time rather than build time. I'm still leaning towards build-time compilation, but it's too late in the Distutils 1.0 release cycle to change things like this. However, I want to have the *option* to do compilation at build time, so people can experiment with it, see if it works, figure out what other features are needed so it really works, etc. The idea is that developers could put settings in their setup.cfg that control when to do byte-compilation; I suspect developers who want to distribute closed-source modules will have to do build-time compilation. Probably the "install" command will need some sort of "don't install source" option, or maybe the build command should have a "blow away source after compiling it" option. Here's my 'byte_compile()' function: as usual, it works for me. Please review it, and if you're following CVS, try it out. (Should be enough to install any module distribution containing pure Python modules.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ def byte_compile (py_files, optimize=0, force=0, prefix=None, base_dir=None, verbose=1, dry_run=0, direct=None): """Byte-compile a collection of Python source files to either .pyc or .pyo files in the same directory. 'optimize' must be one of the following: 0 - don't optimize (generate .pyc) 1 - normal optimization (like "python -O") 2 - extra optimization (like "python -OO") If 'force' is true, all files are recompiled regardless of timestamps. The source filename encoded in each bytecode file defaults to the filenames listed in 'py_files'; you can modify these with 'prefix' and 'basedir'. 'prefix' is a string that will be stripped off of each source filename, and 'base_dir' is a directory name that will be prepended (after 'prefix' is stripped). You can supply either or both (or neither) of 'prefix' and 'base_dir', as you wish. If 'verbose' is true, prints out a report of each file. If 'dry_run' is true, doesn't actually do anything that would affect the filesystem. Byte-compilation is either done directly in this interpreter process with the standard py_compile module, or indirectly by writing a temporary script and executing it. Normally, you should let 'byte_compile()' figure out to use direct compilation or not (see the source for details). The 'direct' flag is used by the script generated in indirect mode; unless you know what you're doing, leave it set to None. """ # First, if the caller didn't force us into direct or indirect mode, # figure out which mode we should be in. We take a conservative # approach: choose direct mode *only* if the current interpreter is # in debug mode and optimize is 0. If we're not in debug mode (-O # or -OO), we don't know which level of optimization this # interpreter is running with, so we can't do direct # byte-compilation and be certain that it's the right thing. Thus, # always compile indirectly if the current interpreter is in either # optimize mode, or if either optimization level was requested by # the caller. if direct is None: direct = (__debug__ and optimize == 0) # "Indirect" byte-compilation: write a temporary script and then # run it with the appropriate flags. if not direct: from tempfile import mktemp script_name = mktemp(".py") if verbose: print "writing byte-compilation script '%s'" % script_name if not dry_run: script = open(script_name, "w") script.write("""\ from distutils.util import byte_compile files = [ """) script.write(string.join(map(repr, py_files), ",\n") + "]\n") script.write(""" byte_compile(files, optimize=%s, force=%s, prefix=%s, base_dir=%s, verbose=%s, dry_run=0, direct=1) """ % (`optimize`, `force`, `prefix`, `base_dir`, `verbose`)) script.close() cmd = [sys.executable, script_name] if optimize == 1: cmd.insert(1, "-O") elif optimize == 2: cmd.insert(1, "-OO") spawn(cmd, verbose=verbose, dry_run=dry_run) # "Direct" byte-compilation: use the py_compile module to compile # right here, right now. Note that the script generated in indirect # mode simply calls 'byte_compile()' in direct mode, a weird sort of # cross-process recursion. Hey, it works! else: from py_compile import compile for file in py_files: if file[-3:] != ".py": raise ValueError, \ "invalid filename: %s doesn't end with '.py'" % `file` # Terminology from the py_compile module: # cfile - byte-compiled file # dfile - purported source filename (same as 'file' by default) cfile = file + (__debug__ and "c" or "o") dfile = file if prefix: if file[:len(prefix)] != prefix: raise ValueError, \ ("invalid prefix: filename %s doesn't start with %s" % (`file`, `prefix`)) dfile = dfile[len(prefix):] if base_dir: dfile = os.path.join(base_dir, dfile) cfile_base = os.path.basename(cfile) if direct: if force or newer(file, cfile): if verbose: print "byte-compiling %s to %s" % (file, cfile_base) if not dry_run: compile(file, cfile, dfile) else: if verbose: print "skipping byte-compilation of %s to %s" % \ (file, cfile_base) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Greg Ward gward(a)python.net http://starship.python.net/~gward/

2 4

Automatically detect wrong lib-format for borland compiler?
by Thomas Heller 02 Oct '00

02 Oct '00

I just had the idea to make bcccompiler a little bit more robust. By default, python is delivered with pythonxx.lib and pythonxx_d.lib import libraries generated by MSVC, which are in COFF format. By inspection I found that these libraries start with the bytes '!<arch>./' (without the single quotes). Shouldn't we open these files and issue a warning or error if they start with these bytes? We could even invoke borland's coff2omf utility to convert them... Thomas

3 3

setup.py for a wrapper extension?
by Pete Shinners 01 Oct '00

01 Oct '00

i've got a python extension that is simply a wrapping around another C library. (not an uncommon case :]) i cannot figure out the 'right' way to check for and link/include this dependency into my distutils setup.py script. under linux, it's pretty easy to assume the correct header and shared library will be somewhere in the standard include and library directories /usr/local/include, /usr/local/lib, etc my main concern is getting it working with windows (and keeping it crossplatform happy for linux). my best bet in windows seems to be walk around the parent directory tree trying to find directories for the dependency?? if that is the best way, it would probably be nice for the linux version to use this method or look in the standard compiler directories ??????? i'm hoping someone out there has an example doing just this sort of stuff i could look at. the documentation doesn't mention anything about this sort of stuff. (except for adding library and include info to the Extensions() call thanks for any help and/or guidance. the distutils have just amazed me. (please help, i couldn't get any responses on c.l.python)

3 4

Does the SWIG support work?
by Greg Ward 01 Oct '00

01 Oct '00

Hi all -- some months ago, I added completely experimental and untested support for compiling SWIG extensions to the Distutils. I even documented it! But I have been unable to verify for myself that it works, since I have been unable to build SWIG on my home PC. I haven't heard any reports of success, and the first reports of failure were from 4Thought last week. So: can anyone vouch for whether the Distutils SWIG support works at all, does the "right thing", etc? What's broken about it, what works? Should it even be documented? Greg -- Greg Ward gward(a)python.net http://starship.python.net/~gward/

2 1