Mailman 3 January 2004 - Distutils-SIG

Sample setup.py for Numeric Python
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi again -- [cc'd to Paul Dubois: you said you weren't following the distutils sig anymore, but this directly concerns NumPy and I'd like to get your input!] here's that sample setup.py for NumPy. See below for discussion (and questions!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/bin/env python # Setup script example for building the Numeric extension to Python. # This does sucessfully compile all the .dlls. Nothing happens # with the .py files currently. # Move this file to the Numerical directory of the LLNL numpy # distribution and run as: # python numpysetup.py --verbose build_ext # # created 1999/08 Perry Stoll __rcsid__ = "$Id: numpysetup.py,v 1.1 1999/09/12 20:42:48 gward Exp $" from distutils.core import setup setup (name = "numerical", version = "0.01", description = "Numerical Extension to Python", url = "http://www.python.org/sigs/matrix-sig/", ext_modules = [ ( '_numpy', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/_numpymodule.c', 'Src/arrayobject.c', 'Src/ufuncobject.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/numpy.def' } ), ( 'multiarray', { 'sources' : ['Src/multiarraymodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file': 'Src/multiarray.def' } ), ( 'umath', { 'sources': ['Src/umathmodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/umath.def' } ), ( 'fftpack', { 'sources': ['Src/fftpackmodule.c', 'Src/fftpack.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/fftpack.def' } ), ( 'lapack_lite', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/lapack_litemodule.c', 'Src/dlapack_lite.c', 'Src/zlapack_lite.c', 'Src/blas_lite.c', 'Src/f2c_lite.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/lapack_lite.def' } ), ( 'ranlib', { 'sources': ['Src/ranlibmodule.c', 'Src/ranlib.c', 'Src/com.c', 'Src/linpack.c', ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/ranlib.def' } ), ] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First, what d'you think? Too clunky and verbose? Too much information for each extension? I kind of think so, but I'm not sure how to reduce it elegantly. Right now, the internal data structures needed to compile a module are pretty obviously exposed: is this a good thing? Or should there be some more compact form for setup.py that will be expanded later into the full glory we see above? I've already made one small step towards reducing the amount of cruft by factoring 'include_dirs' out and supplying it directly as a parameter to 'setup()'. (But that needs code not in the CVS archive yet, so I've left the sample setup.py the same for now.) The next thing I'd like to do is get that damn "def_file" out of there. To support it in MSVCCompiler, there's already an ugly hack that unnecessarily affects both the UnixCCompiler and CCompiler classes, and I want to get rid of that. (I refer to passing the 'build_info' dictionary into the compiler classes, if you're familiar with the code -- that dictionary is part of the Distutils extension-building system, and should not propagate into the more general compiler classes.) But I don't want to give these weird "def file" things standing on the order of source files, object files, libraries, etc., because they seem to me to be a bizarre artifact of one particular compiler, rather than something present in a wide range of C/C++ compilers. Based on the NumPy model, it seems like there's a not-too-kludgy way to handle this problem. Namely: if building extension "foo": if file "foo.def" found in same directory as "foo.c" add "/def:foo.def" to MSVC command line this will of course require some platform-specific code in the build_ext command class, but I figured that was coming eventually, so why put it off? ;-) To make this hack work with NumPy, one change would be necessary: rename Src/numpy.def to Src/_numpy.def to match Src/_numpy.c, which implements the _numpy module. Would this be too much to ask of NumPy? (Paul?) What about other module distributions that support MSVC++ and thus ship with "def" files? Could they be made to accomodate this scheme? Thanks for your feedback -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

4 5

Can now compile simple extensions
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all -- at long last, I found the time to hack in the ability to compile extension modules to the Distutils. Mainly, this meant adding a 'build_ext' command which uses a CCompiler instance for all its dirty work. I also had to add a few methods to CCompiler (and, of course, UnixCCompiler) to make this work. And I added a new module, 'spawn', which takes care of running sub-programs more efficiently and robustly (no shell involved) than os.system. That's needed, obviously, so we can run the compiler! If you're in the mood for grubbing over raw source code, then get the latest from CVS or download a current snapshot. See http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/implementation.html for a link to the code snapshot. I'm still waiting for more subclasses of CCompiler to appear. At the very least, we're going to need MSVCCompiler to build extensions on Windows. Any takers? Also, someone who knows the Mac, and how to run compilers programmatically there, will have to figure out how to write a Mac-specific concrete CCompiler subclass. The spawn module also needs a bit of work to be portable. I suspect that _win32_spawn() (the intended analog to my _posix_spawn()) will be easy to implement, if it even needs to go in a separate function at all. It looks from the Python Library documentation for 1.5.2 that the os.spawnv() function is all we need, but it's a bit hard to figure out just what's needed. Windows wizards, please take a look at the 'spawn()' function and see if you can make it work on Windows. As for actually compiling extensions: well, if you can figure out the build_ext command, go ahead and give it a whirl. It's a bit cryptic right now, since there's no documentation and no example setup.py. (I have a working example at home, but it's not available online.) If you feel up to it, though, see if you can read the code and figure out what's going on. I'm just hoping *I'll* be able to figure out what's going on when I get back from the O'Reilly conference next week... ;-) Enjoy -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Two fixes (at last)
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all -- at long last, I have fixed two problems that a couple people noticed a while ago: * I folded in Amos Latteier's NT patches almost verbatim -- just changed an `os.path.sep == "/"' to `os.name == "posix"' and added some comments bitching about the inadequacy of the current library installation model (I think this is Python's fault, but for now Distutils is slavishly aping the situation in Python 1.5.x) * I fixed the problem whereby running "setup.py install" without doing anything else caused a crash (because 'build' hadn't yet been run). Now, the 'install' command automatically runs 'build' before doing anything; to make this bearable, I added a 'have_run' dictionary to the Distribution class to keep track of which commands have been run. So now not only are command classes singletons, but their 'run' method can only be invoked once -- both restrictions enforced by Distribution. The code is checked into CVS, or you can download a snapshot at http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/distutils-19990607.tar.gz Hope someone (Amos?) can try the new version under NT. Any takers for Mac OS? BTW, all parties involved in the Great "Where Do We Install Stuff?" Debate should take a good, hard look at the 'set_final_options()' method of the Install class in distutils/install.py; this is where all the policy decisions about where to install files are made. Currently it apes the Python 1.5 situation as closely as I could figure it out. Obviously, this is subject to change -- I just don't know to *what* it will change! Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Package versioning
by Timothy Docker April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all, I've been aware that the distutils sig has been simmerring away, but until recently it has not been directly relevant to what I do. I like the look of the proposed api, but have one question. Will this support an installed system that has multiple versions of the same package installed simultaneously? If not, then this would seem to be a significant limitation, especially when dependencies between packages are considered. Assuming it does, then how will this be achieved? I am presently managing this with a messy arrangement of symlinks. A package is installed with its version number in it's name, and a separate directory is created for an application with links from the unversioned package name to the versioned one. Then I just set the pythonpath to this directory. A sample of what the directory looks like is shown below. I'm sure there is a better solution that this, and I'm not sure that this would work under windows anyway (does windows have symlinks?). So, has this SIG considered such versioning issues yet? Cheers, Tim -------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Docker timd(a)macquarie.com.au Quantative Applications Division Macquarie Bank -------------------------------------------------------------- qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/ total 110 drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:23 1.1 -r--r----- 1 root mts 45172 Sep 1 1998 cdrmodule_0_7_1.so drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 chart_1_1 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Fnorb_0_7_1 dr-xr-x--- 3 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 Fnorb_0_8 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 1536 Mar 3 12:45 mts_1_1 dr-xr-x--- 7 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:22 OpenGL_1_5_1 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 1024 Nov 11 11:23 PIL_0_3 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Pmw_0_7 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 v3d_1_1 qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/1.1 total 30 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Apr 10 10:43 _glumodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glumodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 30 Apr 10 10:43 _glutmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glutmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 22 Apr 10 10:43 _imaging.so -> ../PIL_0_3/_imaging.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 36 Apr 10 10:43 _opengl_nummodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_opengl_nummodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 27 Apr 10 10:43 _tkinter.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_tkinter.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 21 Apr 10 10:43 cdrmodule.so -> ../cdrmodule_0_7_1.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 chart -> ../chart_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 12 Apr 10 10:43 Fnorb -> ../Fnorb_0_8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 mts -> ../mts_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Apr 10 10:43 OpenGL -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 opengltrmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/opengltrmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 openglutil_num.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/openglutil_num.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 PIL -> ../PIL_0_3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 10 Apr 10 10:43 Pmw -> ../Pmw_0_7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 v3d -> ../v3d_1_1

3 2

[Distutils-sig] distutils charter and interscript
by John Skaller April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

3 2

MSVC7 directories
by Mark Hammond Feb. 6, 2004

Feb. 6, 2004

Just incase it slips under the radar, I have opened a bug regarding MSVC7 directories. Specifically, changes I make to the directories in the MSVC7 GUI are not seen by distutils. All the details, and a patch, is in the bug: http://www.python.org/sf/883969 [ 883969 ] distutils doesn't see user-directories set via VisStudio 7.1 Any comments appreciated, Thanks, Mark

5 17

RE: [Distutils] PGP keys required? (Re: PEP 243)
by Moore, Paul Feb. 2, 2004

Feb. 2, 2004

From: Michael T. Babcock > Would it be worthwhile to stipulate that anyone who wants to submit a > package to an automated distutils system have a PGP/GPG key signed by > an appropriate Python authority or another developper? Initially these > would all be an "authority" of some form, of course. This at least > allows the authentication of authors' packages as being intact and > submitted by themselves, which then allows a good method of filtering > à la "I like this author's software", etc. via rating systems and the > like. -1. The effect would be to bar new submitters, who wouldn't have the necessary signed key, as well as to people like myself who can't be bothered trying to maintain a PGP key. Paul

4 7

VIRUS IN YOUR MAIL
by postmaster＠panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl Jan. 31, 2004

Jan. 31, 2004

V I R U S A L E R T Our viruschecker found the 'W32/MyDoom-A' virus in your email to the following recipient: -> george(a)panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl Delivery of the email was stopped! Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator to do so. For your reference, here are the SMTP envelope originator and headers from your email: >From distutils-sig(a)python.org ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Received: from python.org (82-35-43-90.cable.ubr02.camd.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.43.90]) by panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B4E16FF for <george(a)panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:45:48 +0000 (WET) From: distutils-sig(a)python.org To: george(a)panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl Subject: Hello Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:42:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_2E75EDA7.DE95A0BC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-Id: <20040131154548.18B4E16FF(a)panoramix.ift.uni.wroc.pl> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

Your mail to maryh@netapp.com
by Auto-Reply Daemon for maryh Jan. 30, 2004

Jan. 30, 2004

This is either an invalid user name or the person you have sent mail to, 'maryh', is no longer employed with Network Appliance. Please take a moment to check your mailing list and update if necessary. Regrettably, we have no forwarding information for 'maryh'. Your message has NOT been forwarded. Please update your records and try again. Please Contact HELPDESK at X6466 for any inquiries. Thank you, IT Department [the body of your message is below] >From distutils-sig(a)python.org Fri Jan 30 14:41:37 2004 >Received: from psmtp.com (caesar [10.64.2.67]) > by caesar.europe.netapp.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/NTAP-1.5) with SMTP id i0UMfaKG017752 > for <mary(a)mx-in2.corp.netapp.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:41:36 -0800 (PST) >Received: from source ([10.64.46.6]) by caesar ([10.64.2.67]) with SMTP; > Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:41:36 PST >Received: from python.org (lns-th2-13-82-64-76-127.adsl.proxad.net [82.64.76.127]) > by mx03.netapp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/NTAP-1.5) with ESMTP id i0UMfU7i029090 > for <mary(a)netapp.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:41:31 -0800 (PST) >Message-Id: <200401302241.i0UMfU7i029090(a)mx03.netapp.com> >From: distutils-sig(a)python.org >To: mary(a)netapp.com >Subject: SPAM: test >Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:41:25 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_FACD4707.AF086ECF" >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-pstn-levels: (C:80.0762 M:99.4056 P:95.9108 R:95.9108 S: 7.2366 ) >X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.0000:1.0000) pmCr >X-pstn-addresses: from <distutils-sig(a)python.org> > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >------=_NextPart_000_0014_FACD4707.AF086ECF >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >------------------ Virus Warning Message (on caesar) > >Found virus WORM_MYDOOM.A in file doc.exe (in doc.zip) >The file is deleted. > >If you have questions, please contact helpdesk(a)netapp.com. > >--------------------------------------------------------- > >------=_NextPart_000_0014_FACD4707.AF086ECF >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Windows-1252" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. > > >------=_NextPart_000_0014_FACD4707.AF086ECF >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >------------------ Virus Warning Message (on caesar) > >doc.zip is removed from here because it contains a virus. > >--------------------------------------------------------- >------=_NextPart_000_0014_FACD4707.AF086ECF-- > >

1 0

Your message to xml-bindings awaits moderator approval
by xml-bindings-admin＠gnome.org Jan. 30, 2004

Jan. 30, 2004

Your mail to 'xml-bindings' with the subject ERROR Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision.

1 0