Mailman 3 October 2005 - Distutils-SIG

Re: [Distutils] distutils install probs on suse 9.0
by Mats Wichmann April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

At 05:43 AM 5/18/2004, David Handy wrote: >On Tue, 18 May 2004, Floris van der Tak wrote: > >> my attempt to install the distutils on suse 9.0 (which provides python >> 2.3) fails: > >Why are you installing distutils on a system that already has Python 2.3 >installed? Python 2.3 normally comes with distutils as part of the Python >standard library. > >Did suse distribute a version of Python that had distutils removed? It should come from python-devel

2 1

Sample setup.py for Numeric Python
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi again -- [cc'd to Paul Dubois: you said you weren't following the distutils sig anymore, but this directly concerns NumPy and I'd like to get your input!] here's that sample setup.py for NumPy. See below for discussion (and questions!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/usr/bin/env python # Setup script example for building the Numeric extension to Python. # This does sucessfully compile all the .dlls. Nothing happens # with the .py files currently. # Move this file to the Numerical directory of the LLNL numpy # distribution and run as: # python numpysetup.py --verbose build_ext # # created 1999/08 Perry Stoll __rcsid__ = "$Id: numpysetup.py,v 1.1 1999/09/12 20:42:48 gward Exp $" from distutils.core import setup setup (name = "numerical", version = "0.01", description = "Numerical Extension to Python", url = "http://www.python.org/sigs/matrix-sig/", ext_modules = [ ( '_numpy', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/_numpymodule.c', 'Src/arrayobject.c', 'Src/ufuncobject.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/numpy.def' } ), ( 'multiarray', { 'sources' : ['Src/multiarraymodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file': 'Src/multiarray.def' } ), ( 'umath', { 'sources': ['Src/umathmodule.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/umath.def' } ), ( 'fftpack', { 'sources': ['Src/fftpackmodule.c', 'Src/fftpack.c'], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/fftpack.def' } ), ( 'lapack_lite', { 'sources' : [ 'Src/lapack_litemodule.c', 'Src/dlapack_lite.c', 'Src/zlapack_lite.c', 'Src/blas_lite.c', 'Src/f2c_lite.c' ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/lapack_lite.def' } ), ( 'ranlib', { 'sources': ['Src/ranlibmodule.c', 'Src/ranlib.c', 'Src/com.c', 'Src/linpack.c', ], 'include_dirs' : ['./Include'], 'def_file' : 'Src/ranlib.def' } ), ] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ First, what d'you think? Too clunky and verbose? Too much information for each extension? I kind of think so, but I'm not sure how to reduce it elegantly. Right now, the internal data structures needed to compile a module are pretty obviously exposed: is this a good thing? Or should there be some more compact form for setup.py that will be expanded later into the full glory we see above? I've already made one small step towards reducing the amount of cruft by factoring 'include_dirs' out and supplying it directly as a parameter to 'setup()'. (But that needs code not in the CVS archive yet, so I've left the sample setup.py the same for now.) The next thing I'd like to do is get that damn "def_file" out of there. To support it in MSVCCompiler, there's already an ugly hack that unnecessarily affects both the UnixCCompiler and CCompiler classes, and I want to get rid of that. (I refer to passing the 'build_info' dictionary into the compiler classes, if you're familiar with the code -- that dictionary is part of the Distutils extension-building system, and should not propagate into the more general compiler classes.) But I don't want to give these weird "def file" things standing on the order of source files, object files, libraries, etc., because they seem to me to be a bizarre artifact of one particular compiler, rather than something present in a wide range of C/C++ compilers. Based on the NumPy model, it seems like there's a not-too-kludgy way to handle this problem. Namely: if building extension "foo": if file "foo.def" found in same directory as "foo.c" add "/def:foo.def" to MSVC command line this will of course require some platform-specific code in the build_ext command class, but I figured that was coming eventually, so why put it off? ;-) To make this hack work with NumPy, one change would be necessary: rename Src/numpy.def to Src/_numpy.def to match Src/_numpy.c, which implements the _numpy module. Would this be too much to ask of NumPy? (Paul?) What about other module distributions that support MSVC++ and thus ship with "def" files? Could they be made to accomodate this scheme? Thanks for your feedback -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

4 5

Can now compile simple extensions
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all -- at long last, I found the time to hack in the ability to compile extension modules to the Distutils. Mainly, this meant adding a 'build_ext' command which uses a CCompiler instance for all its dirty work. I also had to add a few methods to CCompiler (and, of course, UnixCCompiler) to make this work. And I added a new module, 'spawn', which takes care of running sub-programs more efficiently and robustly (no shell involved) than os.system. That's needed, obviously, so we can run the compiler! If you're in the mood for grubbing over raw source code, then get the latest from CVS or download a current snapshot. See http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/implementation.html for a link to the code snapshot. I'm still waiting for more subclasses of CCompiler to appear. At the very least, we're going to need MSVCCompiler to build extensions on Windows. Any takers? Also, someone who knows the Mac, and how to run compilers programmatically there, will have to figure out how to write a Mac-specific concrete CCompiler subclass. The spawn module also needs a bit of work to be portable. I suspect that _win32_spawn() (the intended analog to my _posix_spawn()) will be easy to implement, if it even needs to go in a separate function at all. It looks from the Python Library documentation for 1.5.2 that the os.spawnv() function is all we need, but it's a bit hard to figure out just what's needed. Windows wizards, please take a look at the 'spawn()' function and see if you can make it work on Windows. As for actually compiling extensions: well, if you can figure out the build_ext command, go ahead and give it a whirl. It's a bit cryptic right now, since there's no documentation and no example setup.py. (I have a working example at home, but it's not available online.) If you feel up to it, though, see if you can read the code and figure out what's going on. I'm just hoping *I'll* be able to figure out what's going on when I get back from the O'Reilly conference next week... ;-) Enjoy -- Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Two fixes (at last)
by Greg Ward April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all -- at long last, I have fixed two problems that a couple people noticed a while ago: * I folded in Amos Latteier's NT patches almost verbatim -- just changed an `os.path.sep == "/"' to `os.name == "posix"' and added some comments bitching about the inadequacy of the current library installation model (I think this is Python's fault, but for now Distutils is slavishly aping the situation in Python 1.5.x) * I fixed the problem whereby running "setup.py install" without doing anything else caused a crash (because 'build' hadn't yet been run). Now, the 'install' command automatically runs 'build' before doing anything; to make this bearable, I added a 'have_run' dictionary to the Distribution class to keep track of which commands have been run. So now not only are command classes singletons, but their 'run' method can only be invoked once -- both restrictions enforced by Distribution. The code is checked into CVS, or you can download a snapshot at http://www.python.org/sigs/distutils-sig/distutils-19990607.tar.gz Hope someone (Amos?) can try the new version under NT. Any takers for Mac OS? BTW, all parties involved in the Great "Where Do We Install Stuff?" Debate should take a good, hard look at the 'set_final_options()' method of the Install class in distutils/install.py; this is where all the policy decisions about where to install files are made. Currently it apes the Python 1.5 situation as closely as I could figure it out. Obviously, this is subject to change -- I just don't know to *what* it will change! Greg -- Greg Ward - software developer gward(a)cnri.reston.va.us Corporation for National Research Initiatives 1895 Preston White Drive voice: +1-703-620-8990 Reston, Virginia, USA 20191-5434 fax: +1-703-620-0913

2 1

Package versioning
by Timothy Docker April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

Hi all, I've been aware that the distutils sig has been simmerring away, but until recently it has not been directly relevant to what I do. I like the look of the proposed api, but have one question. Will this support an installed system that has multiple versions of the same package installed simultaneously? If not, then this would seem to be a significant limitation, especially when dependencies between packages are considered. Assuming it does, then how will this be achieved? I am presently managing this with a messy arrangement of symlinks. A package is installed with its version number in it's name, and a separate directory is created for an application with links from the unversioned package name to the versioned one. Then I just set the pythonpath to this directory. A sample of what the directory looks like is shown below. I'm sure there is a better solution that this, and I'm not sure that this would work under windows anyway (does windows have symlinks?). So, has this SIG considered such versioning issues yet? Cheers, Tim -------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Docker timd(a)macquarie.com.au Quantative Applications Division Macquarie Bank -------------------------------------------------------------- qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/ total 110 drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:23 1.1 -r--r----- 1 root mts 45172 Sep 1 1998 cdrmodule_0_7_1.so drwxr-xr-x 2 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 chart_1_1 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Fnorb_0_7_1 dr-xr-x--- 3 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 Fnorb_0_8 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 1536 Mar 3 12:45 mts_1_1 dr-xr-x--- 7 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:22 OpenGL_1_5_1 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 1024 Nov 11 11:23 PIL_0_3 drwxr-xr-x 3 mts mts 512 Sep 1 1998 Pmw_0_7 dr-xr-x--- 2 mts mts 512 Nov 11 11:21 v3d_1_1 qad16:qad $ ls -l lib/python/1.1 total 30 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 29 Apr 10 10:43 _glumodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glumodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 30 Apr 10 10:43 _glutmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_glutmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 22 Apr 10 10:43 _imaging.so -> ../PIL_0_3/_imaging.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 36 Apr 10 10:43 _opengl_nummodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_opengl_nummodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 27 Apr 10 10:43 _tkinter.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/_tkinter.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 21 Apr 10 10:43 cdrmodule.so -> ../cdrmodule_0_7_1.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 chart -> ../chart_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 12 Apr 10 10:43 Fnorb -> ../Fnorb_0_8 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 12 Apr 10 10:43 mts -> ../mts_1_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 15 Apr 10 10:43 OpenGL -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 opengltrmodule.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/opengltrmodule.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 33 Apr 10 10:43 openglutil_num.so -> ../OpenGL_1_5_1/openglutil_num.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 PIL -> ../PIL_0_3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 mts mts 10 Apr 10 10:43 Pmw -> ../Pmw_0_7 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 10 Apr 10 10:43 v3d -> ../v3d_1_1

3 2

[Distutils-sig] distutils charter and interscript
by John Skaller April 29, 2018

April 29, 2018

3 2

setuptools: .egg-info/ and PKG-INFO
by Ian Bicking Nov. 4, 2005

Nov. 4, 2005

I'm trying to figure out how I should deal with the .egg-info directory, and PKG-INFO. Right now PKG-INFO is being generated from setup.py. So I don't want to put it in my source control repository, since it is derivative. But I'm maintaining by hand some other files in the .egg-info directory, usually custom package metadata that we consume internally, so I need those files (and .egg-info) in the repository, and hence in the checkout. However, without PKG-INFO lots of things break, as pkg_resources gives a ValueError during some operations (e.g.: ValueError: ("Missing 'Version:' header and/or PKG-INFO file", ProjectName [unknown version] (/usr/home/ianb/co/IscapeLib/tests/appsetup/output/Proj-05))) -- this happens anytime I iterate over entry points, including when setuptools iterates over entry points, which means lots of setup.py commands are broken. They are broken simply because the incomplete .egg-info directory is on the path, even though I don't need direct access to it. I can run setup.py egg_info (creating PKG-INFO) for some reason (that I have not yet determined), but not my own custom setup.py extensions. This includes stuff like "python setup.py egg_info my_custom_command", so I have to write PKG-INFO in a completely separate command. If the .egg-info directory doesn't exist then pkg_resources will be happy, because it won't try to read the package as an egg at all. But it does, and so it's just awkward. Frankly I'd be 100% okay putting PKG-INFO in source control if it was the authoritative source, and I don't particularly care to use setup.py for this data. But that's a cop-out, I should really figure this out as it is. So... what do I do here? Should pkg_resources really just ignore packages without a PKG-INFO file? At least during scan? If I have to live with running setup.py egg_info until 0.6a7, that's fine. BTW, here's the full traceback I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 18, in ? package_data={ File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/distutils/core.py", line 135, in setup ok = dist.parse_command_line() File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/setuptools/dist.py", line 227, in parse_command_line result = _Distribution.parse_command_line(self) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/distutils/dist.py", line 432, in parse_command_line args = self._parse_command_opts(parser, args) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/setuptools/dist.py", line 549, in _parse_command_opts nargs = _Distribution._parse_command_opts(self, parser, args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/distutils/dist.py", line 490, in _parse_command_opts cmd_class = self.get_command_class(command) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/setuptools/dist.py", line 353, in get_command_class ep.require(installer=self.fetch_build_egg) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1637, in require working_set.resolve(self.dist.requires(self.extras),env,installer)) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 480, in resolve env = Environment(self.entries) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 558, in __init__ self.scan(search_path) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 588, in scan self.add(dist) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 610, in add if dist not in dists: File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1760, in __cmp__ def __cmp__(self, other): return cmp(self.hashcmp, other) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1760, in __cmp__ def __cmp__(self, other): return cmp(self.hashcmp, other) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1755, in <lambda> lambda self: ( File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1782, in parsed_version self._parsed_version = pv = parse_version(self.version) File "/usr/home/ianb/co/setuptools/pkg_resources.py", line 1797, in version raise ValueError( ValueError: ("Missing 'Version:' header and/or PKG-INFO file", ProjectName [unknown version] (/usr/home/ianb/co/IscapeLib/tests/appsetup/output/Proj-05)) -- Ian Bicking / ianb(a)colorstudy.com / http://blog.ianbicking.org

2 5

Re: [Distutils] cli.exe missing from py2.3 egg?
by Phillip J. Eby Oct. 31, 2005

Oct. 31, 2005

At 11:22 AM 10/31/2005 +0000, Richard Cooper wrote: >I've just tried installing setuptools 0.6a6 so that I could install nose >(http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/) via easy_install >but I've hit a problem. > >It looks like cli.exe and gui.exe are not getting installed. To check I >manually downloaded both setuptools-0.6a6-py2.4.egg and >setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg from the cheeseshop and opened them with a >Zip viewer. Sure enough the py2.4 egg contains both exes but the py2.3 >one doesn't. Should the py2.3 egg include these files? Yes it should. I've just released 0.6a7 to fix this. It was mostly a problem in my release build process, which dynamically generated different entry points for 2.3 and 2.4. Unfortunately, using dynamic entry points in setuptools' own setup.py gets into some head-exploding circularities that led to data files not being included in the 2.3 releases. I believe I've fixed this now.

1 0

cli.exe missing from py2.3 egg?
by Richard Cooper Oct. 31, 2005

Oct. 31, 2005

I've just tried installing setuptools 0.6a6 so that I could install nose (http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/) via easy_install but I've hit a problem. It looks like cli.exe and gui.exe are not getting installed. To check I manually downloaded both setuptools-0.6a6-py2.4.egg and setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg from the cheeseshop and opened them with a Zip viewer. Sure enough the py2.4 egg contains both exes but the py2.3 one doesn't. Should the py2.3 egg include these files? Thanks, Richard PS: Here is a transcript of my installation attempt. --- C:\data>python ez_setup.py Downloading http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.3/s/setuptools/setuptools-0. 6a6-py2.3.egg Processing setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg creating c:\progra~1\python23\lib\site-packages\setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg Extracting setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg to c:\progra~1\python23\lib\site-packages Adding setuptools 0.6a6 to easy-install.pth file Installing easy_install-script.py script to C:\progra~1\python23\Scripts error: None C:\data>python "c:\Program Files\Python23\Scripts\easy_install-script.py" nose Searching for nose Reading http://www.python.org/pypi/nose/ Reading http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/ Best match: nose 0.6 Downloading http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/nose-0.6.tar.gz Processing nose-0.6.tar.gz Running nose-0.6\setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir c:\docume~1\rcooper\locals~1\t emp\easy_install-ijtcn6\nose-0.6\egg-dist-tmp-sfmqvp zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents... nose.core: module references __file__ nose.inspect_assert: module MAY be using inspect.getframeinfo Adding nose 0.6 to easy-install.pth file Installing nosetests-script.py script to C:\progra~1\python23\Scripts error: c:\progra~1\python23\lib\site-packages\setuptools-0.6a6-py2.3.egg\setupt o ols\cli.exe: No such file or directory

1 0

Announcing bdist_msi 1.0b1
by "Martin v. Löwis" Oct. 29, 2005

Oct. 29, 2005

I'm happy to announce the first beta release of my long-planned distutils command bdist_msi, at http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/home/loewis/bdist_msi/ http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/home/loewis/bdist_msi/bdist_msi-1.0b1.win… http://www.dcl.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/home/loewis/bdist_msi/bdist_msi-1.0b1.zip Please let me know what you think; it may take some weeks before I can respond, though. Regards, Martin

2 1