Mailman 3 March 2011 - Mailman-coders

[ mailman-Patches-657951 ] Generate RSS summary in archives
by SourceForge.net Aug. 19, 2022

Aug. 19, 2022

Patches item #657951, was opened at 2002-12-23 14:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bwarsaw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i… Category: Pipermail Group: Mailman 2.2 / 3.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Generate RSS summary in archives Initial Comment: Here's a first-draft patch. Things that need fixing: * The generated RSS feed needs to be validated. (It passed the W3C's RDF validator, but RSS validators still need to be checked.) * The date should be given in YYYY-MM-DD format, which requires parsing the .fromdate attribute. * How do I get the URL for an archived message? The generated RSS currently just uses the filename, which is wrong. How do I get at the PUBLIC_ARCHIVE_URL setting? * Getting the most recent N postings is inefficient; the code loops through all of the archived messages and takes the last N of them. We could add .last() and .prev() methods to the Database class, but that's more ambitious for 2.1beta than I like. (Would be nice to get this into 2.1final...) * The list index page should have a LINK element pointing to the RSS file. Please make any comments you have, and I'll rework the patch accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2003-04-18 18:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Andrew, to get the url for the archived message use mlist.GetBaseArchiveURL(), which knows about private vs. public archives, the host name and the list name. From there you should be able to tack on just the part of the path under "archives/private/listname". See Mailman/Handlers/Scrubber.py for an example. Only other minor comment: NUM_ARTICLES can probably go in Defaults.py.in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Justin Mason (jmason) Date: 2003-03-26 16:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935 big thumbs up from me too. Much better solution than http://taint.org/mmrss/ ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Uche Ogbuji (uche) Date: 2003-03-17 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=38966 I'd like to add my vote to this item. This is a fantastic idea, Andrew. Thanks. --Uche ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Updated patch: * Dates are now rendered as ISO-8601 (date only, not the time of the message) * By hard-wiring 2002-December, I got the RSS to validate using Mark Pilgrim's validator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: captain larry (captainlarry) Date: 2002-12-23 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=147905 Just voting for support here. This is *great* thanks for the patch and I hope the maintainers include it as soon as it's appropriate :) Adam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Barry A. Warsaw (bwarsaw) Date: 2002-12-23 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=12800 Deferring until post-2.1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) Date: 2002-12-23 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11375 Argh; SF choked on the file upload. Attaching the patch again... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300103&aid=657951&group_i…

2 1

[Bug 544477] [NEW] setting localhost in postfix_lmtp breaks delivery
by Patrick Ben Koetter Sept. 27, 2020

Sept. 27, 2020

Public bug reported: Setting localhost in postfix_lmtp works against Postfix defaults and breaks delivery. Reason: The Postfix lmtp client only uses dns queries by default to search for hostnames. If the DNS server does not provide an answer for "localhost" delivery from the lmtp client to mailman fails. Solution: Provide "127.0.0.1" instead of "localhost". This does not require DNS and is even faster because it saves DNS lookups. Example: hey2(a)mailman.state-of-mind.de lmtp:[localhost.localdomain]:8024 ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 3.0 mailman -- setting localhost in postfix_lmtp breaks delivery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

4 7

[Bug 701558] [NEW] Content filtering leaves a single sub-part in a multipart message.
by Mark Sapiro June 9, 2017

June 9, 2017

Public bug reported: If the original message is multipart but not multipart/alternative and content filtering removes all but one part, the message is left as a multipart message with only the one sub-part instead of being recast as just the sub-part. This can cause msg_header and/or msg_footer to be added as separate parts to a text/plain message instead of being added to the text/plain body part. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Medium Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: mailman Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: mailman Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: mailman Milestone: None => 2.1.15 ** Changed in: mailman Assignee: (unassigned) => Mark Sapiro (msapiro) ** Description changed: - If the original message in multipart but not multipart/alternative and + If the original message is multipart but not multipart/alternative and content filtering removes all but one part, the message is left as a multipart message with only the one sub-part instead of being recast as just the sub-part. This can cause msg_header and/or msg_footer to be added as separate - parts to a text/plain message instead if being added to the text/plain + parts to a text/plain message instead of being added to the text/plain body part. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701558 Title: Content filtering leaves a single sub-part in a multipart message.

3 7

[Bug 576675] [NEW] Content filtering fails to collapse alternatives.
by Mark Sapiro June 9, 2017

June 9, 2017

Public bug reported: Collapsing multipart/alternative parts to just the first alternative only works if the message itself is multipart/alternative, or the multipart/alternative part is at the first sub-level. For example, given this structure: multipart/mixed | multipart/related | | multipart/alternative | | | text/plain | | | text/html | | image/jpeg | application/msword The multipart/alternative part will not be collapsed. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Medium Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: mailman Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: mailman Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: mailman Milestone: None => 2.1.14 ** Changed in: mailman Assignee: (unassigned) => Mark Sapiro (msapiro) -- Content filtering fails to collapse alternatives. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

3 7

[Bug 707295] [NEW] Membership Management Better Search Function
by arky May 23, 2015

May 23, 2015

Public bug reported: In Mailman Membership Management, I would like to option to filter search results by status viz (hide,nomail [reason], ack, not metoo, nodupes, digest, plain) ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707295 Title: Membership Management Better Search Function

4 3

[Bug 514625] [NEW] Mailman 3 member functions should "guess" address membership
by Stephen Turnbull May 23, 2015

May 23, 2015

Public bug reported: Feature request Mailman 3 should try to fuzzily match unknown author addresses against the member database. For example, if "turnbull(a)sk.domain.tld" is subscribed, then "turnbull(a)shako.sk.domain.tld" probably is the same person. This could probably be efficiently implemented by storing domains in bigendian order, and testing for prefixes. Bonus points for matching on full name. For example, for me personally firstname(a)xemacs.org and lastname(a)xemacs.org both resolve to me, which could not be reasonably associated by algorithm, but I always use the same full name, which would be strong indication that it's me. Possibly matching on mailbox would also be useful, but only as an optimization to be confirmed by one of the other two (or maybe if the match is unique?) Note that for the first example, the second "turnbull@shako" variant is today used only by spammers; I haven't sent a message with that "From" since 1995, and I doubt it's been used as "Sender" more than a very small handful of times since 2000. For this reason, the feature should *never* be automated. Instead, it should be part of the moderation interface. If a match is detected, then an option should appear saying something like "This address appears to be an alias for <member name and address>. [ ] Add <unknown address> as an alias for <member>." ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Feature request Mailman 3 should try to fuzzily match unknown author addresses against the member database. For example, if "turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp" is subscribed, then "turnbull(a)shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp" probably is the same person. This could probably be efficiently implemented by storing domains in bigendian order, and testing for prefixes. Bonus points for matching on full name. For example, for me personally firstname(a)xemacs.org and lastname(a)xemacs.org both resolve to me, which could not be reasonably associated by algorithm, but I always use the same full name, which would be strong indication that it's me. Possibly matching on mailbox would also be useful, but only as an optimization to be confirmed by one of the other two (or maybe if the match is unique?) Note that for the first example, the second "turnbull@shako" variant is today used only by spammers; I haven't sent a message with that "From" since 1995, and I doubt it's been used as "Sender" more than a very small handful of times since 2000. For this reason, the feature should *never* be automated. Instead, it should be part of the moderation interface. If a match is detected, then an option should appear saying something like "This address appears to be an alias for <member name and - address>. [ ] Add <unknown> address as an alias for <member>." + address>. [ ] Add <unknown address> as an alias for <member>." ** Description changed: Feature request Mailman 3 should try to fuzzily match unknown author addresses against - the member database. For example, if "turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp" is - subscribed, then "turnbull(a)shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp" probably is the same + the member database. For example, if "turnbull(a)sk.domain.tld" is + subscribed, then "turnbull(a)shako.sk.domain.tld" probably is the same person. This could probably be efficiently implemented by storing domains in bigendian order, and testing for prefixes. Bonus points for matching on full name. For example, for me personally firstname(a)xemacs.org and lastname(a)xemacs.org both resolve to me, which could not be reasonably associated by algorithm, but I always use the same full name, which would be strong indication that it's me. Possibly matching on mailbox would also be useful, but only as an optimization to be confirmed by one of the other two (or maybe if the match is unique?) Note that for the first example, the second "turnbull@shako" variant is today used only by spammers; I haven't sent a message with that "From" since 1995, and I doubt it's been used as "Sender" more than a very small handful of times since 2000. For this reason, the feature should *never* be automated. Instead, it should be part of the moderation interface. If a match is detected, then an option should appear saying something like "This address appears to be an alias for <member name and address>. [ ] Add <unknown address> as an alias for <member>." -- Mailman 3 member functions should "guess" address membership https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514625 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

4 5

[Bug 543618] [NEW] test breaks if existing mailman.cfg is found
by Patrick Ben Koetter March 24, 2015

March 24, 2015

Public bug reported: The test program reports an error if it detects an existing mailman.cfg: Failure in test test_current_working_directory (mailman.tests.test_configfile.TestConfigFileSearch) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 279, in run testMethod() File "/root/mailman/src/mailman/tests/test_configfile.py", line 107, in test_current_working_directory self.assertEqual(found, config_file) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 350, in failUnlessEqual (msg or '%r != %r' % (first, second)) AssertionError: '/etc/mailman.cfg' != u'/tmp/tmpVfAIyB/home/alex/mailman/hacking/mailman.cfg' I believe it should not do this. It should either silently ignore the difference or use the test mailman.cfg or ... but not break. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 3.0 mailman -- test breaks if existing mailman.cfg is found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

4 6

[Bug 518517] [NEW] Add the equivalent of postconf(1)
by Barry Warsaw April 22, 2014

April 22, 2014

Public bug reported: Postfix has a very handy command called postconf(1) which lets you dump all or one Postfix configuration variable. It would be very handy for Mailman 3 to have something similar. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Medium Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) Status: Triaged ** Affects: mailman/3.0 Importance: Medium Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) Status: Triaged ** Also affects: mailman/3.0 Importance: Medium Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) Status: Triaged -- Add the equivalent of postconf(1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

5 19

[Bug 674352] [NEW] List Moderator Login should check for username
by arky March 12, 2014

March 12, 2014

Public bug reported: List Moderator logins currently prompt for list moderator password only. It would be good idea if prompt for username/password login as well. Mailman: 2.1.9 ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- List Moderator Login should check for username https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

3 3

[Bug 725498] [NEW] expose message-id to templates
by Thijs Kinkhorst Aug. 5, 2013

Aug. 5, 2013

Public bug reported: As reported by Adrian von Bidder to Debian: Please consider this trivial patch, which exposees message-ids to the templates used for the email archive. See it in action on lists.debian.ch. (I don't think my modification to the templates should be in, but having te message-id exposed would mean I won't have to remember to patch mailman on every update...) (AFAICT mailman adds a Message-Id when an incoming email doesn't have one, so this should never be a problem.) ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: mailman (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725498 Title: expose message-id to templates

4 7

[Bug 693134] [NEW] Uncaught bounce from Dovecot when Quota Exceeded
by JorSol June 20, 2013

June 20, 2013

Public bug reported: I have a Debian 5 (Lenny) server with Postfix - Dovecot and Mailman 2.1.11 and 1700+ users. The problem is when Dovecot returns the bounce message about "Quota exceeded", Mailman don't recognize the format: Your message to <user(a)domain.com> was automatically rejected: Quota exceeded It's suposed that Mailman recognize this type of message using the VERP feature, I have "recipient_delimiter = +" in Postfix but Mailman don't detect message coming from Dovecot. /var/log/mailman/bounce: Dec 21 10:58:08 2010 (3214) listnews: bounce message w/no discernable addresses: <dovecot-1292944464-47721-0@mail> Dec 21 10:58:08 2010 (3214) noticias: forwarding unrecognized, message-id: <dovecot-1292944464-47721-0@mail> ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: dovecot mailman postfix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693134 Title: Uncaught bounce from Dovecot when Quota Exceeded

4 13

[Bug 736849] [NEW] Sender header change to improve Outlook
by Joseph Brennan Aug. 31, 2012

Aug. 31, 2012

Public bug reported: FAQ 2.3 describes problems with Outlook's ugly display of Sender "on behalf of" From, giving the example as "From listname- bounces(a)mailman.server.com On behalf of fred(a)poster.domain.com". But Outlook prefers to show the real name and hide the Internet address, when a real name is present. Most commonly the From would be "From: Fred Example <fred(a)poster.domain.com>" and as a result Outlook would display "From listname-bounces(a)mailman.server.com On behalf of Fred Example". If Mailman wrote the Sender header with a real name Outlook would show the name there too. For example, if the list name (local part) were inserted, thus "Sender: listname <listname-bounces(a)mailman.server.com>", then Outlook would display "From listname on behalf of Fred Example" which is much better in appearance and still complies with using a Sender header. RFC 2822 allows Sender to contain a real name. sender = "Sender:" mailbox CRLF mailbox = name-addr / addr-spec name-addr = [display-name] angle-addr ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736849 Title: Sender header change to improve Outlook

3 7

[Bug 500955] [NEW] Templates for AST use inconsistent DOCTYPE
by Matt Selsky June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: Most of the templates use a DOCTYPE of HTML 4.01 Transitional, but the AST templates use HTML 3.2. The patch updates the DOCTYPES for the AST templates. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Templates for AST use inconsistent DOCTYPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500955 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 3

[Bug 500952] [NEW] Extra escape characters in DOCTYPE
by Matt Selsky June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: The DOCTYPE header for 2 files in the sk templates contain extra escape characters around the quote marks. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Extra escape characters in DOCTYPE https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 3

[Bug 637652] [NEW] mailman should respect LDFLAGS
by Hanno Böck June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: mailman Makefile should respect the LDFLAGS variable. See attached patch. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mailman should respect LDFLAGS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

4 6

[Bug 745432] [NEW] Email address with leading or trailing space is not accepted by web subscribe.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: If an address is entered on the web listinfo subscribe form with a leading or trailing space, it is rejected with the message "The email address you supplied is not valid. (E.g. it must contain an '@'.)". This is confusing to the user who looks at the address and sees it does contain an '@' and appears valid. Leading and trailing whitespace should be stripped from the address entry. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Low Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745432 Title: Email address with leading or trailing space is not accepted by web subscribe.

1 2

[Bug 739524] [NEW] Administrivia 'who' matches too much
by Joseph Brennan June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: Mailman/Utils.py has: 'who': (0, 2), This matches subject and start-of-line with many ordinary-language sentences or headings like 'who are you?' or 'Who is affected:'. I suggest dialing it back to (0, 1) which would have far fewer false positives, or even (0, 0) as it once was. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739524 Title: Administrivia 'who' matches too much

2 4

[Bug 721015] [NEW] Typo in cron/gate_news usage() definition.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: The usage function defined in cron/gate_news defines its first argument as 'status' but then refers to it as 'code'. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Low Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721015 Title: Typo in cron/gate_news usage() definition.

1 1

[Bug 705715] [NEW] @listname entries in *_these_nonmembers are case sensitive.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: The listname in @listname entries in *_these_nonmembers should be lower- cased before attempting to instantiate the list. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Low Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705715 Title: @listname entries in *_these_nonmembers are case sensitive.

1 3

[Bug 700528] [NEW] bin/rmlist does not remove the heldmsg-LISTNAME-* files for the list.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: bin/rmlist LISTNAME should remove any data/heldmsg-LISTNAME-* files. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Low Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: mailman Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: mailman Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: mailman Milestone: None => 2.1.15 ** Changed in: mailman Assignee: (unassigned) => Mark Sapiro (msapiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700528 Title: bin/rmlist does not remove the heldmsg-LISTNAME-* files for the list.

1 2

[Bug 697161] [NEW] Bug in mm-handler-2.1.10 regarding lists named xxx-admin
by Sebastian Hagedorn June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: We're running Mailman 2.1.14 and have recently begun using mm- handler-2.1.10 from the contrib directory as MTA for sendmail. Everything appeared to work fine, but after a few months we were alerted by one of our users that no mail was delivered anymore to one of his lists. The list's name is mathematica-admin. It turns out that mm- handler strips the -admin part and tries to deliver the mail to a list named mathematica, which does not exist. We had a small number of other lists with the same problem. I've created a patch that fixes it and another small issue (a variable is passed to a subroutine, but a global variable is actually used there). ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697161 Title: Bug in mm-handler-2.1.10 regarding lists named xxx-admin

2 3

[Bug 666181] [NEW] wrong From field in subscription notification to admin
by Ilya Belyy June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: Create two mail lists ml01 (hosted on domain dom.1) and ml02 (hosted on domain dom.2) Add user to ml01 $ add_members -a y -r - ml01 lkjhlkhlkh(a)wefqwefqwef.com Subscribed: lkjhlkhlkh(a)wefqwefqwef.com Notification email to the admin of ml01 will look as following: Subject: Ml01 subscription notification From: mailman(a)dom.2 To: mladmin00(a)dom.1 Message-ID: <mailman.1.1287993063.7501.ml01(a)dom.1> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:51:03 +0700 Subscribed: lkjhlkhlkh(a)wefqwefqwef.com Apparently, host name of the mail list is not considered when composing the notification message. I've checked 2.1.9 and 2.1.14 - both have the same bug ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wrong From field in subscription notification to admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

2 3

[Bug 702516] [NEW] RFC 2047 encoded From: header is not correctly parsed.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: If a real name or comment in a From: or other sender header is RFC 2047 encoded and the decoding contains an unquoted comma or other special, the Message methods get_sender() and get_senders() can return bogus addresses leading to other issues. A patch is attached. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Medium Assignee: Mark Sapiro (msapiro) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702516 Title: RFC 2047 encoded From: header is not correctly parsed.

2 4

[Bug 677115] [NEW] Reply to to part 3 of a held message notification containing a Approved: first body line fails if reply is base64 encoded.
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: A list moderator receives a held message notification and attempts to approve the message by replying to the third part (second attachment) and including an Approved: <password> line as the first line of the reply. If the moderator's MUA base64 encodes the reply for i18n or other reasons, the Approved: line is not found and the message is discarded. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Reply to to part 3 of a held message notification containing a Approved: first body line fails if reply is base64 encoded. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 2

[Bug 670988] [NEW] Missing format character in Spanish translation
by Mark Sapiro June 15, 2012

June 15, 2012

Public bug reported: The Spanish (es) translation of the bin/check_perms message "%(path)s bad group (has: %(groupname)s, expected %(MAILMAN_GROUP)s)" is missing the 's' in '%(path)s'. This prevents check_perms from reporting/fixing group errors and any other problems not found before the first group error. ** Affects: mailman Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing format character in Spanish translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mailman Coders, which is subscribed to GNU Mailman.

1 2