I figured folks here would want to know that there's an ongoing
discussion of the distinction between `pip` and `twine`, and related
topics (should publishing tools be separate from download/consumption
tools?), in:
https://github.com/pypa/packaging-problems/issues/60
I don't want to break up the conversation into different threads, one
here and one on GitHub,so please consider this a pointer rather than a
fork of the conversation. :)
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Changeset Consulting
https://changeset.nyc
The Warehouse team has improved the new PyPI, available for you to check
out at https://pypi.org/ , to the point where we would love for package
maintainers to try it out, test it, and give us bug reports.
https://wiki.python.org/psf/WarehousePackageMaintainerTesting has
guidelines, things to test (like user registration and project removal),
and how to contact Warehouse developers.
We're hosting four livechat hours this week where Warehouse maintainers
will be in IRC, in #pypa-dev on Freenode
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#pypa-dev , and specifically
available to talk about problems you run into, or about how to hack on
Warehouse.
Tuesday Feb 27th: 1700 UTC / noon-1pm EST
Tuesday Feb 27th: 2300 UTC / 6pm-7pm EST
Thursday March 1st: 1700 UTC / noon-1pm EST
Thursday March 1st: 2300 UTC / 6pm-7pm EST
This isn't the big public beta yet, where we really push the message
widely to get non-package-maintainer users to test the site. Since
Warehouse must be a reimplementation of the existing PyPI, please focus
initially on any differences, missing features, or incorrect behavior
that pypi.org exhibits that affect your workflows for account management
and package maintainership. We'll be soliciting feedback on other
concerns soon! Feedback on user experience, accessibility, and overall
ease of use are welcome.
Thanks,
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Warehouse project manager
Changeset Consulting
https://changeset.nyc
I am new to Python but would like to install to play with some Fast
Artificial Neural Network Library routines.
However I ha a V.7 installed but could not access pip. I uninstalled 2.7 an
then installed latest download which I understand should include pip.
However nothing appears to work.
Just need some poineters to get to first base.
Hope you can help.
The following is dialogue from Python Terminal
Python 3.7.0a4 (v3.7.0a4:07c9d85, Jan 9 2018, 07:07:02) [MSC v.1900 64 bit
(AMD64)] on win32
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information.
>>> pip install wheel
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
=============================== RESTART: Shell
===============================
>>> pip
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#1>", line 1, in <module>
pip
NameError: name 'pip' is not defined
>>> python -m pip install SomePackage
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
>>> python -m ensurepip --default-pip
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
Regards
Peter H. Williams
Try BULB <https://join.bulb.co.uk/refer/peter6806> for great GREEN
<https://join.bulb.co.uk/refer/peter6806> energy saving deals ~ a real
alternative to the BIG six
113 Skelmorlie Castle Road
Skelmorlie
Ayrshire
PA17 5AL
TEL:- 01475 529946
Mobile:- 07773 348117
Skype:- peterhwuk
I'd like to once again prod this PEP towards completion:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0566/
The version numbering question has been decided in favour of calling it 2.1.
The remaining question I'm aware of is whether to make the body text (in the email format of the metadata file) officially represent the package long description. I'm in favour of doing so: at least twine and flit already use this for metadata in wheels.
Thomas
With PEP 566 (metadata 2.1) nearing final review and acceptance, I've
updated the PEPs repo to officially withdraw PEPs 426 and 459 in
favour of PEP 566:
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/0977d33b02920d4619c024b64e35a693220cc…
I also reverted any mentions of metadata 3.0 in PEP 426: that's now
back to referring solely to the never-adopted metadata 2.0.
So while we may still revisit some of the specific ideas in 426 and
459 in future PEPs, any such proposals will share PEP 566's focus on
ease of implementation and adoption.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan(a)gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
I would like to see a clause added to the "Ivalid Package" section of
PEP541 that allows some mechanism for other pypi users to mark a package as
spam. Every day i see more spam packages added to pypi and currently the
only way to get them removed is to create an issue in github.
-Meichthys
hallo Matthew,
> Can you use pip to install your software instead? What are you
no.
> trying to install, exactly? Is it just this old version of
https://www2.fh-lausitz.de/launic/comp/tmp/180212.install_python_setuptools…
> setuptools? Why do you need that?
>
installation prog without issue.
regards Heiko
Hallo Marius,
>> After a few hours I found the following article:
>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2017-October/031712.html
>> ...you can no longer access /simple/ and /packages/ over HTTP and you will have to directly go to HTTPS....
>>
>> - It is true?
>
> Yes.
>
>> - Is this the right place if I have any questions?
>
> Yes.
>
I have not found a official website.
I would have expected an info on the page https://pypi.python.org/pypi.
Where can I find an official statement?
Apparently exist prog on https://pypi.python.org which use http,
but ypi.python.org does not allow http.
It's not easy.
A user should be able to decide for himself whether to use HTTP or HTTPS.
regards Heiko.