In a message of Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:10:04 +1100, Andrew Bennetts writes:
>Ah, ok. Looks good to me, but I'm not the SMTP maintainer, so that doesn't
>count for much... in general, I believe we aim to be "liberal in what we
>accept, and strict in what we send" to maximise interoperability, so this
>patch seems fine. Does Moshe or Itamar want to express an opinion here? :)
Not that I fit the names, but I've been working with them on improving
the SMTP server. I posted a patch a few weeks ago which solves this and
some other problems.
If anyone wants a copy of the patch, just mail me and ask for it. (It
has evolved somewhat since the last posted version, mostly in terms of
the unit tests).
-- Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Anders Hammarquist | iko(a)cd.chalmers.se
Physics student, Chalmers University of Technology, | Hem: +46 31 88 48 50
G|teborg, Sweden. RADIO: SM6XMM and N2JGL | Mob: +46 707 27 86 87